Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Man sollte sich nicht durch den Begriff im iD Editor irritieren lassen. Ausschlaggebend für das Tagging und auch die Darstellung sind die zusätzlichen access-tags hierfür. Ich verweise an dieser Stelle auch nochmals auf das Wiki: highway=path#Examples

Die korrekte Kombination in Deutschland für das Zeichen 240 ist:
highway=path
+ foot=designated
+ bicycle=designated

In anderen Ländern kann auch highway=cycleway
+ foot=designated
+ bicycle=designated
verwendet werden, aber dies wurde in der deutschen Community abgelehnt.

Auch wenn im iD-Editor "nur" Pfad steht, geht es in erster Linie um die beiden bicycle=designated und foot=designated. Daraus, und nur daraus, geht die gemeinsame vorgesehene Nutzung beider Verkehrsmittel hervor.

That would be really helpful for the project. Thanks.

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Ich sehe schon, dass ist wohl ein Darstellungsproblem im iD-Editor. "Pfad" ist hier komplett richtig. Wichtig sind die Zusatztags "bicycle=designated" und "foot=designated".

Schau dir gern mal im Wiki die zweite Zeile dazu an: osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Wege

Ich ändere das mal fix zurück. Danke dir für deine Antwort :)

Wurde bereits von dir geändert.

Hi Langlaeufer, ist hier angepasst: changeset/150336971

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Das Bild ist natürlich schon etwas älter, aber zumindest von Süden hing hier noch ein 240er: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=341844617291523

Laut deinem Tagging wäre hier "DE:239,1022-10" richtig, also ein Fußgängerschild mit Zusatzzeichen "Radfahrer frei", stimmt das?

Hi, dein erfasstes Tagging entspricht nicht dem Verkehrszeichen (traffic_sign=DE:240), was gilt hier nun?
way/210833895
Danke!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Good insight. In principle, wouldn't it be possible to make the changes at least continentally? The effort involved would be very limited.

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Ich hab noch ein paar Tags per Wiki ergänzt: changeset/150230381

Nach kurzer Nachfrage in der Community reicht hier ein "railway=level_crossing" pro Schnittpunkt. Es verhält sich hier identisch wie mit "highway=crossing", da jeder Schnittpunkt ein Konflikt darstellt. Eine zusätzliche Schranke braucht es hier nicht. Viele Grüße

Grüß dich, können wir besser angeben, um was es sich für Barrieren hier handelt?
node/11813924527

Sonst wird hier bei manchen Routing-Apps ein Umweg gemacht.

Danke dir!