Hi, wo steht das? (Kann es hier nicht finden: destination=*?uselang=en)

Thank you!

I have checked a total of about 50 of your edits and was able to add the accommodation's own website in 46 cases, in 3 cases there is simply no website, then you leave it out. And in one case, the accommodation no longer existed.

Just some random examples from your latest edit:
Doesn't exist anymore, written on their official website:
way/129477870

Have an own website:
way/130309406
node/12128443360
node/12128402565
node/5000313021
node/12128439648
node/12128377876
node/12128374360
way/238178478
node/2421597750

The websites are undoubtedly dodgy. hotel-details-guide.com doesn't even have a home page (error 404). The website does not have a valid imprint. All links on ‘Booking’ go to Booking.com with an affiliate link. So why not set Booking.com as the website? Why the diversions via your website? Is there no commercial benefit behind this?

Other anomalies:
- POIs are simply placed ‘over’ existing and tagged POIs
- everything (including people who temporarily rent out a(!) room) is tagged as ‘hotel’
- regardless of the ‘real’ website of the companies, hotel-details-guide.com is always used, although the offers are also available on other websites (own website, booking.com airbnb etc.)
- in densely built-up areas, they are also not very loyal to the location and often one or more houses next to them

Together you have imported several thousand accommodations. And you've seen them all in person? In what period of time? How many did you go to?

Bitte antworten: changeset/155650327

Bitte antworten: changeset/155650327

I was able to revert most of the changes directly back because they were simply wrong. Where do you get your information from? It seems to be incredibly old. And why do you link to such a dodgy platform and not just directly to the hotel website? Is this all just advertising?

Das ist auch falsch! Hier steht "St. Gallen" auf dem Schild!
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/mcliquid?lat=47.37548492840577&lng=9.674832175852885&z=19.246751800699005&pKey=587511746113556&focus=photo&x=0.4858503851448658&y=0.6623216432849255&zoom=0

Das ist aber nicht korrekt! Auf dem Schild steht unverkennbar St. Gallen und St. Magrethen!
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/mcliquid?lat=47.391106439438346&lng=9.644347312378272&z=18.507249083154512&pKey=2871102849886792&focus=photo&x=0.4931973640348478&y=0.5102535763122402&zoom=0

Unabhängig vom Namen, ist an der Stelle aber doch trotzdem ein Gletscher oder nicht? basemap.at zeigt hier die gleiche Farbe wie beim Hochgletscher neben an und auf den letzten vier Sommer-Luftbildern sieht man einen Gletscherrand.

Hi, soll ich das für dich eintragen?

Sollte man bicycle=yes zur "Sicherheit" ergänzen?

Hoi, gilt maxspeed:forward mit 80 hier nicht mehr?

Danke dir!

Hi, wurde das Gebäude abgerissen?

Review: "natural" bei einem menschengemachten Becken klingt falsch, aber ist genau so dokumentiert :)

Danke dir, hab den Namen entfernt.

Im Arlbergbahntunnel wird doch immer noch eine Deckenstromschiene und kein Stromschienensystem verwendet oder nicht?

Alpine Führer und die SAC-Karte sind keine nutzbaren Quellen. Siehe: osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...?

Aus meiner Sicht fällt der Name "P.2841" ohnehin unter den Abschnitt "Konstruierte Namen":
osm.wiki/DE:Key:name#Verwendung

Wenn der Name vor Ort nicht ausgeschildert ist, sollte er entfernt werden: osm.wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Fixed in changeset/155513373

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!