Hallo, ich bin kein großer Fan davon, überall das Wort "proposed" zu verwenden. Insbesondere wenn man bedenkt, dass bisher noch keine Variante beschlossen wurde und somit nicht einmal sichergestellt werden kann, wie und wann etwas gebaut wird.
Bisher gibt es auch keinen mir bekannten Renderer, der diese Daten darstellt. Welchen Mehrwert haben diese Daten dann hier?

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Gemäß § 126 Abs. 3, Pflichten des Eigentümers, Baugesetzbuch (BauGB) ist eine Hausnummer an ein Grundstück und nicht an ein Gebäude gebunden. Davon weicht auch das Bayerische Straßen- und Wegegesetz (BayStrWG) in Art. 52 nicht ab.
Die Nummerierungspflicht besteht damit für bebaute und unbebaute Grundstücke.

Hallo, sollte das Stück nicht eher railway=razed sein?
Vergleich Mapillary von letztem Jahr:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1271104303633137

Bei railway=abandoned steht im Wiki "Abgebaute aber noch erkennbare Bahnstrecke ohne Schienen". Ich würde nicht sagen, dass hier noch was erkannt werden kann oder? Der Belag auf der Straße wurde komplett erneuert.

Im Wiki von railway=razed finde ich den Abschnitt "Railway physical features are completely removed." schon treffender.

Was meinst du?

Hallo, warum hast du hier die Hausnummer 30 gelöscht?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145230940

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, im PDF steht auch "Kälberweide", ich habe es korrigiert.

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi Paul,

I've actually never been to Florence. But still nice to meet you here. I actually write all my changeset comments by hand.

Even though I can understand the reasoning behind your large changesets, I still think it makes sense to restrict them regionally. I work with OSMCha and Achavi and there such large changesets (especially in the quantity as in your case) generate an IMHO completely unnecessary background noise and thus only complicate the locally concentrated work during the review.
In addition, these large changesets take an extremely long time to load in these tools, even if there are only a few changes in total.
It can happen to anyone that you accidentally jump from one continent to the next, for example with MapRoulette, and forget to upload in between. No problem. But I think you're using a system that can be adapted for the empathy of everyone else. Since your changes look semi-automated anyway, it shouldn't be a problem to restrict them regionally.

What do you think?

Wishing you a wonderful rest of the Advent season, happy holidays and a happy new year.
mcliquid

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!