Ich schau mir das nochmal an. Müsste irgendwo noch die Fotos haben!

Ist in beide Richtungen so: http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/46.96226/15.34681/standard&lonlats=15.347621,46.961887;15.346259,46.96296&profile=car-eco

Hallo hlfan, du hast hier oneway=yes auf oneway=no geändert. Stimmt das wirklich so. Das Routing sieht so sehr gefährlich aus: http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/46.96306/15.34691/standard&lonlats=15.346034,46.962447;15.347821,46.96318&profile=car-eco

way/236403167

Aber ist dann "designated" wirklich richtig? Würde nicht einfach nur "yes" reichen?
In Österreich ist Fahrradfahren im Wald größtenteils verboten. Der Community-Konsens ist meines Wissens, dass man die Entscheidung den Routern überlässt und nicht an alle Waldwege ein "bicycle=no" ergänzt.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, meinst du hier wirklich "motor_vehicle=designated" oder eher "destination"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316063

Warum hast du die Schnellladestation gelöscht? Wurde diese schon wieder abgebaut? node/10095575644/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141309279

Wir können das auch nach deinem Schema machen.

Zu deiner ersten Frage: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorarlbergerisch

Zu deiner zweiten Fragen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/haben-motorradparkplatze-oder-recyclingcontainer-adressen/79445/

Auch passend: https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=9.52/47.42/10.29&layer=addr_place_or_street_rank28

Adressdaten werden von Kartenherstellern aggregiert, also die nächstgelegene Adresse verwendet. Genau wie auch Boundaries funktionieren. Siehe osm.wiki/Boundaries

Wenn dein Navi ohnehin nicht mit OSM arbeitet, warum trägst du es dann so wie es dein Garmin möchte in OSM ein? Bitte lesen: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Kannst du auf der Wiki-Seite von amenity=charging_station irgendwo lesen, dass man dazu Adressen ergänzen soll? Ich nicht. Bitte lesen: amenity=charging_station

Zeawas, also zumindest in Österreich erfassen wir keine Adressen an Ladestationen. Adressen sind nur an Objekten zu erfassen, welche für die Postzustellung geeignet sind. Oder hat die Ladestation einen Briefkasten? ;)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141302672

It is supplemented with a laughing smiley, so on the one hand humorous, on the other hand the rules still seem to have passed the person after so many changes, do they?

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141268406

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141270980

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141271209

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141274899

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141274932

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141274943

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Da müsste man den Grundstückseigner nochmal fragen, ob das Verbot nun für alle gilt und nur ihn/sie selbst ausnimmt oder ob alle Landwirte der Umgebung den Weg mitbenutzen dürfen. Ob No oder private ist Geschmackssache, am Ende bedeutet es das gleiche für den Router.