No worries! Was there over Canada Day and figured I’d get it updated :) I think the bridge is slightly offset to the north of where it should be but I didn’t have means to verify

highway=street_lamp isn’t part of the new tag scheme that’s correct. I overlooked removing highway=street_lamp from the merged data.

Light source doesn’t use the highway tag as not all light sources are inherently on a road or path. They could be in a garden, building, etc. In this case they’re all on roads, but it’s a more flexible namespace in general.

I can definitely go through and remove the legacy tag from the merged data if you think it’d be best.

No, they are using the new light:*=* namespace as discussed in the forum thread.

Thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/city-of-coquitlam-street-light-import/144010/7

Wiki: osm.wiki/Vancouver/Imports/Coquitlam/Street_Lamps

Thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/city-of-coquitlam-street-light-import/144010/7

Wiki: osm.wiki/Vancouver/Imports/Coquitlam/Street_Lamps

Hello! Thanks for your contribution. When working on houses, it's best to use the Q key to square them off so they better reflect the reality on the ground. This helps eliminate the small crookedness that comes with free-drawing building outlines.

Hi Hilby, thanks for your contribution.

When writing changeset descriptions, please include more information about what is actually included in the changeset. This allows other mappers to understand your changes at a glance without having to dig into the changes individually. This can help streamline discussion and conversation surrounding your changes.

You can find guidance on writing changeset comments here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks,
Max

Hi E_Mathieu,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please note that something being private property does not mean it should be removed from the map.

Instead, proper access tags should be applied to prevent routing software from sending people down the path, and to signal to users that the path is private and not to be used.

I have reverted this changeset in changeset/182855314, but also gone ahead and added private access tags to this section of path.

You can find our policy on mapping private information here: osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information

And information about access tags here: access=*

Please let me know if you have any questions!

Thanks,
Max

Hi Seantreibh, thanks for your contributions.

When making changesets, please use the changeset description to write a summary of what you worked on. Your source can go in the source section when uploading your changeset.

This helps other mappers get a better of idea of what you've changed.

Thanks!
Max