I love the drawing in of these shrubs so much.

Added the spring in changeset/87825665.
changeset/87825665

Thank you for your contributions to OSM. You did a great job of adding details to your place of childhood.

A few notes:
* Adding "(My Home)" doesn't make a lot of sense for the map. Who would look at the map and know who the "My" is? It's sufficient to just add the generic name of things.
* Names are not for descriptions. The fourwheeler path is just a nameless path.

I have updated some of your changes in changeset/80603317

I hope you continue to contribute to map adding places you are familiar with.

I fixed a few of these. Some are me clicking the wrong button, or the autocomplete filling out something other than what I expected. I'll address the rest tomorrow.

I will definitely look at them and fix or respond, but it will probably be tomorrow. Thanks for the review.

Thanks for the catch. I have witnessed that the tag fixing in iD can sometimes have "fixes" that, at least to me, may be questionable. I've tried to get better about scrutinizing each auto-fix. When covering a large area like this is it's reasonable I may sometimes miss something like this, which had I noticed the significant name change would have raised red flags for me.

Please provide more meaningful comments in your changesets. For example, "Added Saint George Plantation Clubhouse."

Thanks for contributing.

It looks like you did a good job here. Thank for the contribution.

Not sure how I did that. I have fixed that tag.

The "name" tag is used to provide the name of an object, not a description.

This is very helpful in understanding the intentions behind this. Thank you.

There is no signage at this building indicating the existence of the Law Office at this location.

It's hardly the issue I'm willing to stake a major claim in, but I don't see any harm in businesses, or a consultant they are hiring, creating one-off accounts for the purpose adding their data to OSM as long as that data is accurate.

I listed my reason for believing that this business actually exists at this location in my original comment.
The street-level imagery donated by Bing does not confirm it though. I'll drive by today and see.

I greatly appreciate that effort, but I think this one was a false positive.

This entry seems to be a legitimate entry. They have a website at https://www.thebakerlawoffice.com/ which confirms the address of this law office.

The building tag was removed, but the building is still here. I have added the building tag back. I was here last Friday. I should have noted the name of the new business.

Is the area mapped here accurate?

Is there a single entity named "Woods of Filmore Gazebo & Playground" or are the gazebo and playground two things?

The way I read the "Open areas" part of the wiki article is that landuse=religious is for an area that is used for religious purposes, but is not a church, mosque, synagogue, etc

I presume you are referring to way/557703530

Unless I'm wrong, the area currently tagged is all part of the property of Trinity Community Church. If not, then the bounds should be redrawn to properly mark their property.

Looking at the street view data, it looks like there are houses here. Is the geometry of this park overly broad?