OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64632700

This is a nice artwork! However, Im not sure if the tag highway=service is valid for this case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64632700

64634470

Nice art, unfortunately, it doesn't belong to OSM. changeset/65346257
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64634470

64634470

This is amazing art, unfortunately it does not belong to OSM, daleted in this changeset changeset/65346257
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64634470

64704189

This edit contain graffiti and has been deleted in this changeset: changeset/65340474
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704189

64704484

This edit contain graffiti and has been deleted in this changeset: changeset/65340474
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704484

64704959

This edit contain graffiti and has been deleted in this changeset: changeset/65340474
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704959

64160274

Hi telemetria pepsico,
I noticed that roads you added has geographic coordinates in the name tag. See example: way/640791591

Could this be a data conversion issue? Please fix, I notice similar cases in your other changesets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64160274

64185423

Are these really the names of the paths? Im not a native english speaker, but it sounds profane to me.

62761130

Other edits by this user, need further investigation.

62761130

This user has been adding letters (POKE) on several occasions already, see:

* https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62760564/
* https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62296958/

Both edits are now removed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62761130

62262168

This building import has a few issues:
1. nodes have building=yes tag.
2. map symbol from imported data was also included as a feature (ie. cross icon for hospitals, triangle flag for schools).
3. some building do not look like it exist on the ground.

One changeset I sas partially fixed this. https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62462400/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62262168

62286090

reverted here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62310689/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62286090

61420020

This edits seems to have deleted a lot of POIs. Can you clarify the intent?

60641082

Wrong changeset comment. I added service roads around the neighbourhood.

60563050

@peter, thanks for the revertion. I clearly made a mistake here.

> elaborate on the rationale for making this section of Southeast Division Street a dual-carriageway

I interpreted the no passing zone as indicated in the road marking as a proxy for dual-carriageway since it implies "crossing the line is prohibited". I am probably wrong.

I did tried as much as I can to retain the relations, but I obviously did not do a good job using iD. I'll be careful next time.

60117308

Fixed some errors from this changeset. See: changeset/60237156
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60117308

59474972

I think this was accidental, fixed here: changeset/59486397

54200864

Thanks you, I fixed it here: changeset/54316775

53664525

hi sheinna,

we noticed your edits was part of an organized edits, we documented it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/33

53659791

hi Randell,

we noticed your edits was part of an organized edits, we documented it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/33