if you are allowed to wheel them then `bicycle=dismount` would prob be a better choice

Hi Alex,
You might want to double check the names on this bus stop and its companion, node/485404019.
Newent Ave is a more likely correct name for this stop as there are multiple stops on Kingsways and the others are name after the crossing street which is a normal practice.
Kind regards,
Kits

They only started changing the hill after the flyover's completion, its been ongoing for a few weeks. i'm not sure what their goal is but they've had around 10 or 15 bulldozers and excavators just moving earth around up there.

That's a fair argument however I would recommend holding off on changing this for now as the area in question along with the entire hill to the east of the fuel station is undergoing large scale land alterations and this slip road may change. To emphasize this, the gate you referenced no longest exists nor does the fence or even the land it sat on.

Hi,
The south west bound lane is never used for travel at it originates from no where and in practice is only used for lorries to park facing NE-bound or as a short cut for cars turning right out of the fuel station (which they shouldn't really do). This is just a remnant of the old heads when it was a 3 lane single carriageway that just never got demolished.

Kind regards,
Kits

Reason for high number of deletions:
This grid was the first mapped for this project. at the time all overlapping cables were mapped as separate ways. overlapping ways are now grouped into a single way utilising circuits tag and power=circuit relations.

Many ways also had excessive amount of nodes which have been simplified to a accuracy of 1m.

Hi there, it appears you moved this solar panel and made it part of a road. node/6593133691 I've now fixed it but please be more careful in future
kind regards,
Kits

Hi again,
I want to apologize. I think I was a bit too quick on the revert button on this one when the only detail that was wrong was the wikidata link. I've updated the details mostly back to what you set while also adding a bit. I've also added "Utilita Arena Cardiff" as a alternate name to the wikidata object. i'm not sure the wikidata procedures but that the main name of the object possibly should be updated too but i'm unsure on that one.

Kind regards,
Kits

on second thoughts, the name could be changed to "Utilita Arena Cardiff" and alt name to "Cardiff International Arena" but the wikidata should remain the same since it refers to the same building, just the new name was missing from the wikidata.

Hi, i'm revert this as the original details were correct. The Cardiff International Arena is also known as the Utilita Arena for sponsorship reasons. The wikidata you linked is also extremely incomplete and doesn't even refer to a Wikipedia page. the original wikidata was missing the utilita alias so i've now added that.

Kind regards,
Kits

changeset/161544217

Hi Derick.
Mapping sidewalks as separate ways is an approved proposal giving it the highest status of legitimacy in this community. Sidewalks do not have to be separated from the highway to be mapped as a separate way. As the wiki states, a sidewalk mapped as a separate way is a refinement of footway tags. Allowing more detail to be added than is possible with highway tags alone. I would suggest you have a read of osm.wiki/Sidewalks before continuing. If you wish to discuss the mapping of sidewalks I would suggestion you do so on the forums as there is a ongoing conversation.

If you do choose to remove these sidewalks then I have to agree with rskedgell that it cannot be described as anything other than vandalism. These sidewalks are perfectly acceptable and in many ways preferable to tags on the highway.

Kind regards,
Kits

ok i've just fixed it

Hi there Ben,
You should reuse building ways whenever possible rather than deleting and creating a new one in its place to maintain the history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161176329

Hi there JP,
Welcome to OSM.
Unfortunately Royal Mail's find a postcode service's terms and conditions is not compatible with OSM's license and as such it cannot be used as a source when mapping.

With the addresses, the correct way to solve this situation is with the addr:parentstreet tag but unfortunately the web editor doesn't display a field for this tag.

I've fixed these issues for you.
Kind regards,
Kits.

to add a little extra, the bus station as a whole is defined with the amenity=bus_station area. I believe there is also a relation that can be used to hard link everything together but i dont believe i've used it before.

Hi there, I'm reverting this. The public_transport=platform node represents a bus stand not a bus stop or station. This station has 12 stands. The public_transport=platform node should be placed at the location people wait to board the bus. each platform can optionally have a corresponding public_transport=stop_position node that is placed where the bus stops on the highway. the name of both nodes should match. You can use Merthyr bus station as an example if you like, osm.org/edit#map=20/51.7443294/-3.3797592. Its is complete with bus routes.

Kind regards,
Kits

changeset/160932201

Hi, I've reverted this because it is the incorrect usage for highway=motorway_junction. This type of node is used to make a motorway exit not entrance and is place as the start of a off ramp. please see the wiki for more info highway=motorway_junction

changeset/160652681

Thats a fair argument, i've gone through some recent historic satellite imagery now and i agree, a lot of what i just walked on is less then 10 years old so this makes more sense.

It does seem like a rather large oversight that they didn't build anything to span that gap when rebuilding the a465.

So I walked the stretch between Garnlydan and Brynmawr today and its odd. There are signs on nearly all the minor forks on the path but the signs are missing for all the major forks. there's even no signage at the east end nor at the ramp from the B4560 where I entered the path.

There is also a information board near the A465 highest viewpoint which has a simple map on it show amoung other things, NCN paths, it seems to show the south path of the 46 along with the 466 but not the north path.

The sign post at the viewpoint also marked as west from the viewpoint as a "local cycle route" and east as part of the "Ebbw Fach Trail" but no mention of the NCN route.

I think my original theory still stands and the north route was meant to be removed but they skipped the majority of the harder to get to signs. it also terminates literally in a garage's storage yard and doesnt really go anywhere. however since we map what's on the ground if you have no objections i'll remap it as a separate link route rather than a alt path of the main route. I think this makes more sense since it a dead end and I suspect they will remove it eventually.

I'll also look into this Ebbw Fach Trail since its seem rather extensive and well marked. the map indicates that it extends all the way down to Aberbeeg.

Hi Ceirios, You may have made a row of street lamps instead of bollards here: node/12427193541