Hi there Richard, There is no need to add a cross over in the middle of the intersection. It better to keep it a more standard box setup which also avoids needing to use restriction. I've cleaned it up in this changeset changeset/158662440.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158624156

Hi Andy,
I've corrected the small error in bryn bach park. I must have forgot to delete it when moving the cycle path to the footway.
I have been keeping an eye on it as part of keeping the A465 updated between hirwaun and merthyr. I didn't notice the issues further east.

The Hirwaun junction should be complete now. I believe the plans showed the cycle path simply going around the footpath of the roundabouts but would need to survey to be sure.

The missing section by Clwydyfagwyr is still very much missing, this part is prob under the most construction atm.

Where the path deviates at Ebbw Vale, I would say the north path is the correct one as it goes past a new view point that marks the highest point on the A465 next to the layby.

There is a marker sign visible here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.794811104118&lng=-3.2406067041258666&z=17&pKey=828924529172279&x=0.6828198013385215&y=0.5073284517773355&zoom=0.23349817312209759&focus=photo

I will prob survey the cycle path here next chance I get. its only about 10 mins from home.

reverting holy rock as I do not believe there is a holy rock in the middle of this field

changeset/158086862

reverting changeset #156728549 for removing transformers official name without reason

changeset/158085245

Hi there, you should also change sidewalk tag on the road to sidewalk=separate when mapping sidewalk as separate ways.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158062863

Hi there,
There is no need for concern, this is very normal. Your browser is caching the parts of the map, this is normal and used to reduce load on the server. usually you can force a full refresh with Ctrl + Shift + R in most browsers. The cache will also naturally expire over time. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Browser_cache
Kind regards,
Kits

Hi there,
It appears you added a duplicate line on top of the existing one by mistake. I've corrected this and replaced it with a track with no motor vehicles allowed.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157684673

Hi there CaseGiffGaff,
Just to let you know I'm in the process of importing 11kv power lines and will be covering this area very soon. To try and avoid too many conflicts I would ask you to avoid adding any more for a while.
osm.wiki/NGED_Import_Project
Thanks,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157504285

Hi,
This change is incorrect, the town is spelt "Fleur-de-lis"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157433739

Hello Darklot, and welcome to OSM.

although this changeset does not appear malicious overall, it has quite a few bad and dubious changes. In Llanbradoch, you deleted a service road that shouldn't have been deleted and made a bit of a mess out of the landuse=residential area. In Fleur-De-Lis you connected St Deinois Close to St Davids Rd when it shouldn't be. you also added a view point and a named rock to Rhymney river, nether of which I believe exist. For these reasons and the fact you've got a history of adding fictious data, I'll be reverting this changeset. If this is a genuine attempt at making improvements to OSM, I encourage you to make smaller changes to begin with until you get the hang of editing so that your changes can be more selectively critiqued. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have,
Kind regards,
Kits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157352361

Hi eajones,
you might want to check out Tredegar and Rhymney gold course. osm.org/#map=17/51.750175/-3.263594 it has already been mapped to a relatively high standard so it may be useful as a reference.

Correction on the revert message, this one was reverted because all that was changed was a solar panel was moved from a roof into a road.

Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

changeset/157351570

Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

changeset/157351570

Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

changeset/157351570

Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

changeset/157351570

Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

changeset/157351570

Hello Tapa,
In all your recent changesets you've been adding blank areas instead of buildings. To change this, select an area in the editor then click on "Area" button in the top left and then search for "Building", this will then change the blank area into a generic building. Please note that untagged areas don't get rendered to the map but buildings do. You have also created a few overlapping areas in some places like here: osm.org/edit?editor=id&#map=20/2.6924346/-73.1903277
please fix this before continuing.

Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156838633

Hi RunEveryStreet,
Welcome to OSM. I believe you have made a small mistake here, max height should be added to the road that is affected not to the road on the bridge. I've fixed this now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156816387

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F