kitsee's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 157433739 | Hi,
|
|
| 157352361 | Hello Darklot, and welcome to OSM. although this changeset does not appear malicious overall, it has quite a few bad and dubious changes. In Llanbradoch, you deleted a service road that shouldn't have been deleted and made a bit of a mess out of the landuse=residential area. In Fleur-De-Lis you connected St Deinois Close to St Davids Rd when it shouldn't be. you also added a view point and a named rock to Rhymney river, nether of which I believe exist. For these reasons and the fact you've got a history of adding fictious data, I'll be reverting this changeset. If this is a genuine attempt at making improvements to OSM, I encourage you to make smaller changes to begin with until you get the hang of editing so that your changes can be more selectively critiqued. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have,
|
|
| 157249571 | Hi eajones,
|
|
| 157348133 | Correction on the revert message, this one was reverted because all that was changed was a solar panel was moved from a roof into a road. |
|
| 157348133 | Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added |
|
| 157347864 | Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added |
|
| 157229538 | Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added |
|
| 157229498 | Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added |
|
| 157229338 | Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added |
|
| 156838633 | Hello Tapa,
Kind regards,
|
|
| 156816387 | Hi RunEveryStreet,
|
|
| 156728477 | osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F |
|
| 156728477 | Reverted as OSM is built on public information such as imagery as such details can't be removed simply by request. |
|
| 156728446 | Reverted as OSM is built on public information such as imagery as such details can't be removed simply by request. |
|
| 156541323 | reverted changesets 156541289, 156541323 due to mass deletion without description and failed to respond to comments. |
|
| 156541289 | reverted changesets 156541289, 156541323 due to mass deletion without description and failed to respond to comments. |
|
| 156662962 | I will accept there is a argument for meadows here, I wasn't aware that meadows was also used for hay although I question how well that tagging will work since a farmer may choose grain over hay on a particular year but that's not a conversation for here. As for way/131600335, yes you did not created it but you did change it from landuse=farmland to landuse=grass in this changeset. landuse=grass is not correct here and should be changed. |
|
| 156707943 | High there Canalsman,
|
|
| 156662962 | Hi, I dont think these changes are correct, most of these fields appear to be growing fields from imergery so should be tagged landuse=farmland not meadows. also landuse=grass is used wrong on way/131600335#map=15/51.95377/-3.88672. landuse=grass is used for managed areas of grass like a lawn. from imagery this area appears to be a mix of farmland and meadows. |
|
| 156522727 | personally I think there is a enough evidence from imagery that this should be replaced with a mini-roundabout node as there is no physical island as its just painted on. |