katpatuka's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 103278722 | changeset comment test... |
|
| 50423502 | Hi FreedSky ;) If you've got some spare time can you gave a look at 岳塘区 subarea relations? Two areas are broken, some seem to be old or merged with other areas. zhwiki shows 11 街道 and one 镇 while http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/43/03/430304.html lists 9 街道。。。 Also 雨湖区 needs an update 3 old 街道 and one new 街道。。。 |
|
| 62900682 | Ok... The smaller area will have a name too but we don't know it ;) btw: you could have it fixed too ;) |
|
| 42069 | hm - what do you find 'nice' in the 13 years ago edited huge area...?! I don't have no clue... ;) |
|
| 96476727 | Ok, thanks - I wasn't aware of the merging ;) zhwiki still shows 中山南路街道 while osm shows a 中南 (中南街道 on stats.gov); 利民路街道 is deprecated I suppose? |
|
| 96476727 | Hello Lepuse, can you tell if the subdivisions of 弋江区 need to get updated? zhwiki and osm show 10 街道 and one 镇 but http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/34/02/340203.html lists only 6 街道,,, |
|
| 45405880 | viola: way/467458053 in relation/3393610 und relation/3393596 |
|
| 45405880 | danke ;) |
|
| 45405880 | Do those powerlines in China (ways 249711856, 467458053 and 235096683) really have to span over 450 km ?? They are part of relations anyway - way not split them into chunks of 50-100 nodes? Additionally way/249711856 is member of two relations: relation/6893920 and relation/8121493 - isn't that redundant ? |
|
| 96486091 | Hello SierraIm, Do you know if 东区街道 in 黄埔区 still exists or has it been merged renamed ? It's not listed on http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/44/01/440112.html - only in 2017 http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2017/44/01/440112.html |
|
| 92163242 | Hello Jyunhou, I use GNS data to add missing towns and townships in China to osm; the data sometimes includes alternative names which I just deposit under the alt_name tag ;) Feel free to remove the wrong ones... |
|
| 98859643 | You're welcome ;) |
|
| 98781256 | Please be very cautious when editing county and town boundaries: the relation for 阳江市 relation/3032037 has now gaps and isn't a closed way anymore - I'll try to fix it... |
|
| 58340334 | Hello, Do you know if 乌桥街道, 新福街道, 永祥街道, 海安街道 and 金厦街道 in Shantou still exist? http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/44/05/440511.html does not list them anymore - last listed there for 2018... |
|
| 8795075 | Bildirim için teşekkür ederim ;) Adı değiştirdim, bugün yarın gözükecek... |
|
| 94757441 | Fixed - thanks for notification ;) |
|
| 61557845 | Hello HolloWorld, You've tagged lots of 'grave yards' around here: node/5824763178 ... A graveyard is an area of graves or tombs so may be you should tag them all as cemetery=grave (see osmwiki) and tag the whole area as amenity=grave_yard + landuse=cemetery. It's a huge area - doesn't it have a name? |
|
| 81837979 | Thanks for editing in 柘荣县 ;) I don't know mapwith.ai indicating the use of "Artifical Intelligence" but you've used RapiD 1.0.7 to tag all ways as "residential" (usually convenient inside residential areas like villages or towns). - this is unfortunately not very suitable because I also see ways which I would tag as track, unclassified or tertiary. I recommend reading osm.wiki/Zh-hant:Key:highway for guidelines how to tag highways ;) |
|
| 58920855 | Some survey points seem to be in the sea - for example node/5614899467 - correct ? ;) |
|
| 46445010 | Thank you. I had a controlling look and refined part of the road (ways 873351159 and 873351161) according Maxar Premium near Bản Đô (connected unconnected residential roads, added a stream, added 2 bridges over the stream). |