Buildings added by this changeset were copy-pasted; their "source:*" tags are therefore inaccurate. I realised this while continuing another area.

I'll try to figure out how to batch delete those tags soon.

I hadn't noticed that - thanks!

Note: this node was recently adjusted to information=map and I think it's useful to keep the information that it is tactile. However, because this one has 3D elements, I think I'll retag it as information=tactile_model in a few moments. See also: changeset/180456012

On second thought: I think information=tactile_model may more accurate; I will apply one more edit to that node.

Thanks for these updates - NB: I have reverted one change from this changeset, to adjust information=map back to information=tactile_map on node node/5331191656

After questioning this, I went and resurveyed, and the wheelchair=no tagging is appropriate. The defibrillator cabinet is mounted at a height that is only really suitable from the top of two adjacent steps, and those same steps also obstruct wheelchair access to the cabinet.

NB: I forgot to mention: I browsed the artist's website to find the name and start_date for this artwork. I remembered the artist's name thanks to knowing about other installations of theirs in Edinburgh.

Is the wheelchair=no tagging on node/7098651864 intentional here? From a recent look I think that the cabinet is at a height that would be operable from a wheelchair, but I am not certain.

Thanks!

Thank you!

For Mereway (e.g. 4189557 and 1159463221), as a dual_carriageway=yes I think that bicycle=yes is implied. With that in mind and also the presence of a dedicated cycle path nearby (67827330), I would suggest removing the bicycle=yes tagging from the dual carriageway -- especially as parts of it are tagged lit=no in addition.

I learned of this changeset from a forum post at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-a-problem-with-a-user-being-very-rigid-with-legal-interpretation-of-access-rules/139067/27

@[Pete Owens] tagging the footway as bicycle=no appears to have the effect of causing the CycleStreets router to suggest to the user that they should ride on the road regardless of the riding style (quiet / fast) that they select.

Is that what you intended, or would bicycle=dismount be more appropriate?

Ok, thanks - I'll trust you on this. If you know whether there is a good/clear pedestrian path to the beginning of the trail from the bus stop on Hillfoots Road, that could help - but don't worry. I do remember the service buses up to the monument (white, multi-passenger golf-cart style buses if I remember correctly).

Thanks - I agree that the step feature -- including handrails on at least one wall of the building -- could be refined. To begin with I have simplified the shape: changeset/180523240

Thank you!

Nope, my mistake: both the circular area and west side feature are indeed hedge-like. Even so, I'd suggest considering natural=shrubbery with shrubbery:density=medium - it's up to you.

NB: the circular area in the middle of Gardner's Crescent Gardens, and also the feature along the west side of the garden, are both flowerbeds, not hedges, I think. I'll go to check that soon. Ref: way/1391609216

Hi - thanks for contributing to the map; I think your edit might have reduced the routability of this path for pedestrians, though. I could be mistaken, but I seem to remember this being a relatively wide section of pedestrian-access path that leads to a trail up to the Wallace Monument -- so I'm not sure that retagging as highway=service is ideal. Please could you check?

I've also opened a note for other mappers at: way/216949700

Thank you!

Thanks for the updates - the shape one of the ways seems unexpected after the edits; could you take a look? It is: way/434879816