OpenStreetMap
jakecopp's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by jakecopp
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5193775 | jakecopp | There’s a pedestrian footbridge connecting the two buildings around here. |
|||
| 5084197 | mjog | Unable to answer "Do these traffic lights have a button to request a walk signal?" – Crossing With Pedestrian Signals – node/4385253875 via StreetComplete 62.0: These traffic lights(?) dont exist any more |
|||
| 5124965 | jakecopp | Is this pedestrian bridge actually named the south bridge, while the one a few blocks south doesn’t have south in the name? (ie. is the name of these two pedestrian bridges correct) |
|||
| 4476364 | mod22 | There is an (unmapped) crossing here. via StreetComplete 59.2 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 2639486 | 塔之屋 |
||||
| 4582225 | h1dden | "when driving West on McEvoy street you cannot turn right into Botany road at the traffic light as the navigation direction indicate. There is a no right turn sign there"
|
|||
| 4613162 | aharvey | Telstra Willoughby Exchange, but site sold so unclear if still a Telstra site via StreetComplete_ee 60.0 |
|||
| 4442979 | sudface | I have updated the newly opened apartment buildings based on a walking survey on 2024-09-19 but the tagging of the complex's sections may be incorrect. Please fix them if necessary |
|||
| 2900840 | ThatMapGuy | The small part in the upper right corner is actually a separate building (public WC). Two stories tall. via StreetComplete 35.2 |
|||
| 4562189 | jakecopp | Should this be tagged as a dead end footpath and not a connecting cycleway? I don’t think it’s legal to cycle on this road. |
