ivanbranco's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 81551562 | Ciao astraspera, c'è qualcosa di strano qua: relation/10757413/ sei sicuro che questo fosso: way/555746949 abbia lo stesso nome del torrente? Vorrebbe dire che Sillaretto di Villanova è un tributario di Sillaretto di Villanova... |
|
| 122959169 | Ciao, grazie per i chiarimenti. wikipedia=*#Secondary_languages i tag wikipedia secondari hanno senso solo se le pagine non sono collegate da interlink. In questo caso lo sono quindi non è necessario. Buon mapping! |
|
| 129527815 | Sorry for the multiple comments, but more I look into it, more I don't understand it. Why you set the building with height=0? The building outline should have the max height, in this case height=11.5 also:
was it meant to be building:min_level=3 + building:levels=4 (in this case the outline should have building:levels=4 as well)? Please see: osm.wiki/File:Minlevel.svg ^but this link case is about having "void" under it, in this specific case I think it would be more correct to just tag the smaller part as building:levels=4 and exclude the bigger part from it, also to avoid overlapping (which is not appreciated by 3d renderers based on what I know) |
|
| 129527815 | also @SekeRob, I just noticed you keep using the member role "buildingpart" instead of the documented (see Simple 3D Buildings schema) role "part". "buildingpart" was used in the past by tagging schemas such as IndoorOSM that are now obsolete and/or deprecated. |
|
| 129527815 | p.s. per me queste relazioni sono al piu' superflue ma non errate, la descrizione base è "Relations of type=building are used as one way to group elements that form a building in Simple 3D Buildings." e tra le casistiche c'è anche "or the building has a complex structure with lots of parts", che non è questo il caso, ma era per segnalare che avere "a building part hanging over" non è l'unico requisito. |
|
| 129527815 | Scusate se intervengo. Anche se la relazione fosse necessaria, duplicare il tag name=* nella relazione non è corretto imho, dalla wiki: "This outline must be tagged with building=*. The outline also holds any other tags (e.g. address, name, overall height, operator, ...) which apply to the building as a whole." In pratica queste relazioni dovrebbero avere type=building come _unico_ tag essendo un mero contenitore, tutto il tagging vero e proprio va sull'outline. traduzione automatica: Sorry to interrupt. Even if the relation was necessary, duplicating the name=* in the relation is incorrect imho, from the Wiki: "This outline must be tagged with building=*. The outline also holds any other tags (e.g. address, name, overall height, operator, ...) which apply to the building as a whole." Pratically these relations should have type=building as the _only_ tag being a mere container, all the actual tagging goes on the outline. |
|
| 122959169 | Ciao ja+, come mai hai cancellato train=yes da Milano Centrale?
e perché duplicare il link wikipedia in inglese? |
|
| 129321071 | colour=verde
Ciao Pasquale, il tagging corretto è
|
|
| 129431293 | Ciao Pasquale, ricordati di aggiungere anche addr:street=* quando aggiungi gli indirizzi sennò verrà segnalato un errore in Osmose e altri tool QA |
|
| 129254489 | Ciao McCio, ora però esiste San Gabriele di Sopra ma non più San Gabriele di Sotto, che è diventato solo San Gabriele. facendo qualche ricerca sembra un toponimo esistente, l'ho trovato sia in articoli di giornali che in un documento del comune di Piacenza. Forse andrebbe aggiunto un terzo nodo di classe superiore (o declassate le due suddivisioni)? |
|
| 127585509 | HI CBradioCZ, I don't understand, you tagged this shop as not:brand:wikidata=Q9196793 while tagging website=https://www.cropp.com/cz/cz/
|
|
| 126046023 | I deleted it, feel free to add it again with proper tagging. |
|
| 129236021 | Hi Bitcoinshire, please don't put non-neutral descriptions at businesses: "we offer the very best cars combined with the best service in the business. We're one of the highest-rated used car dealers in the country selling some of the nicest and rarest" This is an advertise, not a description. Also is copied and pasted from their website, which is copyrighted: "© Prestige Cars Kent" |
|
| 129197892 | Ciao Pasquale, ricordati di aggiungere anche addr:street=* quando aggiungi gli indirizzi sennò verrà segnalato un errore in Osmose e altri tool QA |
|
| 129129625 | Ho riguardato le foto e non era nemmeno una colonna, ma un muro. Ho sistemato. In ogni caso mi sembra che l'aeroporto debba ancora essere sistemato, ad esempio quel layer=2 sembra messo lì per zittire gli errori piu' che altro ecc. |
|
| 129160829 | check_date:payment=YYY-MM-DD
Then I guess check_date:payment=* is fine. survey_date is definitely wrong if you didn't visit a place in person. |
|
| 129153711 | That's what I'm trying to understand also: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=17441326 Since I got no reply from who is adding the data, I'm tried asking to who fixed it. They say their data is somehow verified, but your edit proves them wrong? You can read more about this edits here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543 |
|
| 129160829 | Hi saunter, there's a typo in this date: "survey:date=2022-11-20t" (the final 't'). The survey:date tag is to be user for the date of survey tho. As someone noticed here ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543/23 ), seems improbable you are surveying all these places: Nov 20 in Romania, Nov 04 in Czechia and Scotland, Nov 03 in Switzerland, Nov 02 in Brasil and so on. What are you trying to describe with this tag? The date of the edit is already attached in every changeset metadata, together with your username, editor, changeset number ecc. |
|
| 129153711 | Hi tastrax, why you say it's spam? Isn't it true they accept bitcoin as payment method? |
|
| 120910246 | Hi, seems like you deleted some highway name: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nXk could you fix it please? Good mapping |