Hi,

what's the meaning of the building_part=neighborhood tag?

Grazie mille, buon mapping!

Ciao Matteo,

so che è un changeset di sei anni fa, ma Osmose continua a lamentarsi di questo elemento: way/439325076/history

dice che manca il tag information=*
presumo sia information=office?
information=*

Tra l'altro il civico lo avevi già spostato nella posizione corretta con un altro account in questo changeset: changeset/128208035

Il dato è corretto ora, dove lo vedi visualizzato ancora nella vecchia posizione? Probabilmente devi cancellare le cache del browser.

Visto che è corretto direi che il fixme si può togliere.

Hi msnritou,

please notices that names are not descriptions, name:en=swamp seems wrong to me.

Nope, mapping buildings as node is only less detailed, but clear to everyone and documented on the wiki. Mapping a building as building:part=no to tell the renderer that the element IS a building part is just weird, the value is not documented anywhere and the logic behind it goes against the current 3d mapping schema, which requires that "the entire building outline should be filled with building:part=* areas" (from the Wiki).

In your example you flag the outline as a building part to "save" an incomplete rendering, but why not using building:part=yes then?

building:part=no is semantically wrong and makes no sense. And is confusing to other people. You read that and think the mapper wanted to flag the exact opposite.

Scusami Balaabirami,

ma in quali foto satellitari e stradali hai visto marciapiedi ai due lati di ogni "braccio" della Galleria Vittorio Emauele" e cordoli a raso sulla pavimentazione a mosaico?

Hi KKK-jp,

node/9778674047

can the building:levels tag be moved to the building outline?

Ok I got what you mean (I think), from the Wiki:
"The building outline provides backward compatibility for 2D rendering software, such as Mapnik, and other data consumers not interested in 3D modeling. When a building has any building:part=* areas, the building outline is not considered for 3D rendering."

Imho this is "lying for the renderer". I don't think 3d renderers know what building:part=no mean, they don't care about the value at all (they don't render differently if it's building:part=balcony or building:part=column) so you are "lying" to the renderer telling him the outline IS a building part.

The proper solution imho would be to have a building:part with the same outline geometry. The difference is that in the building (not :part) outline is tagged with the attributes that are common to the whole building (such as the address) while the building part would be just there for the renderer (so without address). Also considere that the outline needs to have the max height, while the building part would have the outline height minus the roof height.

Maybe someone with better english can re-phrase this better.

tl;dr building:part=no is wrong imho and should be fixed with an additional building:part

Also I noticed you deleted some languages (such as uyghur) and changed the cyrillic names with latin names (in languages such belarusian or ukrainian). Maybe is better to edit only names in languages you know and leave a fixme for the others?

Changed "India" with "Sikkim" in borders names apparently: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/133266354

"Thanks♪(･ω･)ﾉ" is not a useful changeset comment, please read: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

here you could have written "changed india with sikkim in border names" or something similar for example

good mapping

Hi benoitdd,

node/9791185325/

what kind of place is this one? there's only the tag name

Because I had a similar problem. By the way since my message there's now an update for Streetcomplete that asks you if the places is changed or is still the same while editing the name so we shouldn't worry about this anymore.

Good mapping :)

Ciao MattyFranz,

way/923393453

ricordati che su OSM usiamo per convenzione l'inglese britannico, quindi surface=terra non va bene, puoi trovare sulla wiki i valori corretti (qua presumo surface=ground ?).

Buon mapping :)

Ciao Dolomites,

way/1110778482/history

su OSM si usa per convenzione l'inglese britannico, quindi surface=erba è errato, potete usare surface=grass invece

buon mapping :)

Hi kaveh2018,

node/2311431469/history

you mapped this as mountain_pass=yes two years ago, and then changed it with a generic place=yes and then with a place=unknown. It's not a mountain pass? If not do you know a more specific value for it?

Hi, 4 months passed and no reply arrived, I deleted them in changeset/128574090

Ciao mauroc48,

node/1327984575

e

node/10163895367

hanno strani valori di place=*, che va usato per indicare se un posto è una città, un quartiere, un villaggio ecc. riesci a dargli un'occhiata?

Oh, nice catch! I didn't see the other bay. I agree, we should keep the older one and delete this, I'm gonna procede with the edit, thanks for the feedback :)

@maro21 I see problems with the automated edit but not with content of it, what's the meaning of leaving building:part=no with building=yes? Isn't it implied?