OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
118374990

Hi skipper76,

way/1039404054/history

what kind of place are the ones you added? place=yes is quite generic. Are they neighbourhood, city blocks, something else?

You can read some available values here: place=*

118355150

Hi Stephen,

as I already tried to explain you (changeset/117973822):

names should not be descriptions. So name=hut+building=yes
should be
building=hut

118291442

29.418 total changesets, 22.119 of them without comment.

At least 4 users already asked him to properly comment changesets in the last year:
1. changeset/96015876
2. changeset/112373185
3. changeset/117042655
4. changeset/117638017

118337524

Hi Dimitar155,

node/9569531605

what type of place is this one? place=yes is quite generic

118301576

This is their second try importing stuff: changeset/117872687

Good luck commenting them changesets, they didn't replied once: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15178304

118316907

Hi Thomas,

I saw you added two place=Idsingen, I suppose you wanted to use addr:place=Idsingen?

118311811

Hi MaksKZ,

way/673816457/history

place=residential is not a common value. Also the place you added is already mapped as a node (node/2598689068/history): osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I would restore the previous situation, what you think?

118248001

Hi Arbs,

I don't think the place=* node fits well a ski restort. Are you aware of this tags: osm.wiki/Winter_sports#Resorts ?

82019675

Hi Ernesto, this comments are two years old but the tags are still there (example: way/779980768/history ), I see you're still an active user, could you fix them?

118189458

Hi Chetan, why you deleted the old place node and created an identical new one instead of just moving it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118189458

118155419

Ho linkato per sbaglio la way, la relazione è questa: relation/8368355

118155419

Dal momento che i tag sono stati trasferiti da un elemento all'altro (dalla relazione alla way) ovviamente sembra lo abbia creato io, ma prendiamo ad esempio il landuse che avevi citato prima (la way/595901649): è stato creato tre anni come relazione (way/595901649/history). History e Pewu dando la storia del singolo elemento non danno una visione d'insieme, ma da OSMcha si vede. Ciao.

118146193

Hi Chetan,

osm.wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dshop

amenity=shop is deprecated, please don't use it anymore. Also please add a meaningful changeset comment: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

118155419

Può essere, in questo CS non ho creato nessun nuovo landuse a parte valorizzare due scuole con landuse=education, le altre erano tutte classificazioni già presenti. Ho semplicemente eliminato multipoligoni inutili (con un solo membro), inner superflui, staccato i landuse dalla strada ecc.

118118104

Ha 24 changeset commentati dal 2017 ad oggi e non ha risposto mai nemmeno ad uno. O non è interessato a collaborare o non li legge neanche (magari non gli arrivano le email).

117973822

Hi Stephen,

names should not be descriptions. So name=garden is wrong, leisure=garden is enough.

Same thing with:
name=hut+building=yes
you could just use
building=hut

118055152

Hi Stephen,

you deleted the tags from this former highway: way/883905689

now is a line without tags, could you check it out?

118130551

Also you changed this waterway=river to a waterway=Bing

way/219747450/history

118130551

Hi Stephen,

way/1037359808/history

the correct tag for farmlands is "landuse=farmland", not "place=farm land"

118094598

Hi georgie,

please be attentive, you dragged some nodes here, could you fix it?