I fixed it now, thanks: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/97421192

Hi MarioKrammer,

way/97421192/

what's the meaning of ref:nid? The documented use is for heritage monuments in Poland, but this element is on Germany.

Hi donovaly, I saw you are adding lot of wikipedia links in Tirana. If it's not a big problem could you adapt your workflow to add the values without underscores? From the wiki: "Use the human readable title of the article, for example 'en:St Paul's Cathedral' rather than the version with underscores"

Thanks and good mapping

Hi Erick,

"the DWG has, numerous times, asked you to apply useful changeset comments when making edits to OSM."

Perché sulle rotonde é implicito e ridondante.

Hi StopConsuming_StartProducing, is "(the original one)" really part of the name?

yes what? can the tag second_hand be deleted?

Ciao Bagigio,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6031620085
eliminando questo POI hai cancellato anche il civico 32, che ora non risulta piú nel database. Presumo esista ancora? In casi del genere andrebbero cancellati solo i tag inerenti all'attivitá (amenity e name in questo caso)

@Accipiglio per conoscere il significato di un tag consulta la wiki: osm.wiki/IT:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
"Un parco è un'area aperta usata per scopi ricreativi", questo non é chiaramente il caso

inoltre cosa significa "the local Municipality considers it as 'green'"?

Hi based_kronberger, thanks for your contributions!

I noticed a couple things:
way/175334415
here you did add the address to the building outline, but it was already present in the proper building relation: relation/2342359

way/1102636555
same here, you added the address to the outer way instead that to the relation, this edit also created a duplicated building

way/369730250
here you duplicated the address to a building:part. You also added the tag building, but an element can't be a part of a building and a building at the same time

way/175108137
here you changed addr:street from "Sheshi Skënderbej" to "Rruga Sheshi Skenderbej", but there's no element with such name in the database as far as I know
you also changed building=office to building=yes. Usually a value should changed from a generic one to a more specific one, not the opposite.

Hi divaddivag,

why did you add back a link to a non-existing image: node/1494437697/history ?

"This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference."

This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/152109463

Si puó rimuovere il nome anche da: way/832329838
"stagno / kal"?

node/11099347605

ma c'é davvero una palestra qui?

Un parcheggio con 0 posti? Cosa intendevi?

I don't think it was an arrogant message. However, I agree it would be a good idea to contact local users, especially in cases like this where a highway=construction is mapped in the immediate surroundings. It's a clear indicator that the situation has recently changed and the imagery could be outdated.

In any case, calling people trolls should be avoided and good faith should be assumed. There's no need to escalate the discussion with such words.

Hi nolalesseico, I wonder what's the reason of using throw-away accounts to revert?

This changeset has been reverted in: changeset/151905964

This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/151884136

It's the second time the name got deleted by two different users, could you try to get in touch with them before re-adding it a third time?

Also could you please reply to other changeset comments, you never did: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12058187

>> Una mappatura dei sidewalk così è deprecata

Deprecata da chi? Mappare i marciapiedi a parte permette un maggior dettaglio, secondo me non é mai raccomandabile cancellare qualcosa per sostituirlo con qualcos'altro di dettaglio minore.