Ciao McCio,

ora però esiste San Gabriele di Sopra ma non più San Gabriele di Sotto, che è diventato solo San Gabriele. facendo qualche ricerca sembra un toponimo esistente, l'ho trovato sia in articoli di giornali che in un documento del comune di Piacenza. Forse andrebbe aggiunto un terzo nodo di classe superiore (o declassate le due suddivisioni)?

HI CBradioCZ,

I don't understand, you tagged this shop as not:brand:wikidata=Q9196793 while tagging website=https://www.cropp.com/cz/cz/
which is the wikidata brand. Why so?

I deleted it, feel free to add it again with proper tagging.

Hi Bitcoinshire,

please don't put non-neutral descriptions at businesses: "we offer the very best cars combined with the best service in the business. We're one of the highest-rated used car dealers in the country selling some of the nicest and rarest"

This is an advertise, not a description. Also is copied and pasted from their website, which is copyrighted: "© Prestige Cars Kent"

Ciao Pasquale, ricordati di aggiungere anche addr:street=* quando aggiungi gli indirizzi sennò verrà segnalato un errore in Osmose e altri tool QA

Ho riguardato le foto e non era nemmeno una colonna, ma un muro. Ho sistemato.

In ogni caso mi sembra che l'aeroporto debba ancora essere sistemato, ad esempio quel layer=2 sembra messo lì per zittire gli errori piu' che altro ecc.

check_date:payment=YYY-MM-DD
could be a solution but in cases where other payment methods are tagged (such as cash, mastercard, visa ecc.) other people could think you checked ALL the available methods. On the other hand having
check_date:payment:lightning=*
check_date:payment:lightning_contactless=*
check_date:payment:onchain=*
could be too much.

Then I guess check_date:payment=* is fine. survey_date is definitely wrong if you didn't visit a place in person.

That's what I'm trying to understand also: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=17441326

Since I got no reply from who is adding the data, I'm tried asking to who fixed it. They say their data is somehow verified, but your edit proves them wrong? You can read more about this edits here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543

Hi saunter, there's a typo in this date: "survey:date=2022-11-20t" (the final 't').

The survey:date tag is to be user for the date of survey tho. As someone noticed here ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543/23 ), seems improbable you are surveying all these places: Nov 20 in Romania, Nov 04 in Czechia and Scotland, Nov 03 in Switzerland, Nov 02 in Brasil and so on.

What are you trying to describe with this tag? The date of the edit is already attached in every changeset metadata, together with your username, editor, changeset number ecc.

Hi tastrax,

why you say it's spam? Isn't it true they accept bitcoin as payment method?

Hi,

seems like you deleted some highway name: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nXk

could you fix it please? Good mapping

Hi Hi Streams,

something went wrong with this import, see: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nXi

Hi tms13,

seems like here something went wrong with the layer value: way/1080940241/history

Hi horisyu,

seems like the name tag ended up as the layer=* value by mistake: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nXf

Hi,

there's no need to add bicycle=no and horse=no to highway=pedestrian, those values are implied, see: osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Worldwide

Hi k2101,

way/277711514/history

I know it's a 2 years old changeset, but I have doubts about this edit.

You changed the name from n.4 to n.5. But the website seemed to refere to n.4 (seems like is not working anymore). Wikidata also pinpoint a n.4 school at these coordinates: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18431838

Hi,

the image=* tag is for images depicting the object, not for logos.

You changed internet access tag from wlan to a more generic =yes, why so?

The telegram contact doesn't seem to work anymore.

The description is: "Manufacturer of wood industries" (instagram also refence to wood stuff), while the object is tagged as a supermarket, while the website looks like a electronic online shop. What's really this place?

You added 40 (!!) payment methods, are those methods all really available?

Hi SekeRob,

was the deletion of the name intentional here?
way/969270222

Now the Lavino Stream has a "hole" in his route: relation/13041001/

this was supposed to be a small changeset in Krakow, apparently I edited something in my hometown as well by mistake. I'm gonna fix it, sorry for the big changeset area!

Ciao Valentino,

per le immagini di commons c'è un tag dedicato, quindi:
wikimedia_commons=File:AVOPALESTRINA.jpg
invece di
image = https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/AVOPALESTRINA.jpg