OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
122977185

Ciao Botaler,

node/226904585

c'è un problema con questo benzinaio. Il codice univoco ref:mise è un duplicato di questo: node/228116764

122765138

Ciao Canfe,

c'è qualcosa che non va con questo nodo:
node/228137284

nome e brand:wikipedia/wikidata fanno riferimento a Esso, mentre il tag brand a Q8.

inoltre il ref:mise univoco appartiene ad un altro benzinaio: node/228137512/

119254430

way/1047583271/history

Ciao Andrew,
hai taggato come highway=service alcuni pezzi di un corso d'acqua, riesci a dargli una controllata?

Buon mapping :)

119719323

Hi, since:
1. I see you are still active but didn't reply
2. You never replied to the other 2 changeset comments other users did

I will procede myself with this edit, good mapping :)

117493743

Ciao agliatav,

way/1032368310/history

ho cambiato da indoor=wall a barrier=wall in quanto il primo tag è da usare solo per muri interni di edifici.

Buon mapping :)

53535600

Hi Andy, I see you're still active. Do you know how this node can be fixed?

123105512

Hi dru1138,

way/376127839/history

this way have an invalid place value, place=shoal, it should be natural=shoal. But the way is already tagged with natural=wetland

It's a shoal or a wetland?

123056732

Hi Erick,

the tag place=RumiWilco has an invalid value, place values are stuff like town, city, suburb, district ecc. could you check it out please?

Obrigado and good mapping :)

123008069

Hi Masutani,

what are this kind of place=photospot you're adding, such as here?: node/9856016312

123031630

Hi Surcrose,

I saw you just edited this place name: node/3048801807/history

but the place has no specific value, just a generic "yes", since you changed its name I guess you know what kind of place it is so we can fix it with a proper place value? :)

122828958

Dovrei aver sistemato io con /123007377 e /123007224

122636221

Hi CHAINDER19,

I see 7 blocks didn't work out for you.
You're still using useless changeset comments ("1"). You added disconnected ways, ignoring the iD alert ("warnings:disconnected_way:highway"). But most important, you added highway features that ARE NOT visibile in the imagery you say you used for this edit ("Bing Maps Aerial"). I wonder how you edit without aerial imagery reference. Also, those highways seem to be visibile in available imagery ( Maxar and Esri non-clarity), but with different geometry. You can use those if you want to perfect the highways you already draw.

Thanks for the contributions and good mapping

122959768

I tried translating them and they seem more like descriptions. Maybe they were notes for you for remembering mapping landuse=grass et similia that you forgot deleting before uploading?

122959768

Hi OSMoz,

I'm confused, you put survey as a source but you don't know what are these places you added?

node/9853440980/history
node/9853440975#map=19/45.82886/4.61363

122959233

Hi UWJ,

way/1074228095

I don't really see the point in adding a generic place=yes for an unnamed area, landuse=residential is enough, what you think about it? :)

79438217

Hi brianh :)

I found this place=historic_locality from two years ago.
relation/10569993/history

This place value is not very common (it's used here only), I was thinking to change it with place=locality+historic=yes, what do you think about it?

122763990

If someone needs this data they can just do a query for boundaries inside the admin_level=8 Rome boundary.

122763990

I post here since a conversation already started: I don't think this relation has much sense: relation/14281406/history

Relations are not categories: osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Otherwise we could create relations such "City boundaries of Lazio" ecc.ecc.

118014618

Hi Janjko,

node/9549340451
node/9549340450

this nodes have both addr:housenumber and nohousenumber tags. Could you check them out please?

Good mapping :)

122925601

Sembra che con questo changeset hai tolto il tag addr:housenumber a elementi che avevano sia addr:housenumber che nohousenumber.

Ad esempio: node/7446509109

questo nodo aveva sia addr:housenumber=5 che nohousenumber=yes
Con questo changeset hai eliminato addr:housenumber=5 mantenendo solamente nohousenumber=yes.