Tags do not need to be supported by editors by the way, there are lot of "de facto" and "in use" tags that are not part of iD presets.

Please read the wiki: species=*

The species=* tag is for the species only. Data consumers expect to find the species in the species tag, not the genus.

Ciao Ghazikadii, benvenut* su OSM!

Dalle immagini di Bing sembra un grosso edificio a più piani, inoltre ci sono molte macchine parcheggiate intorno. Sei sicuro sia una "house" (casa indipendente che ospita una sola famiglia)? Sembra più un condominio, ma non ho conoscenza locale

grazie per le modifiche e buon mapping!

Vedo ora che è un bioparco sociale (dal sito che hai allegato all'elemento parco). Penso che non sia *anche* il nome dell'edificio, per cui lo rimuoverei.

grazie ancora per le modifiche

Ciao li_lucarini,

way/1489418276

questo edificio si chiama davvero "Vita da Pacos"? Vedo inoltre che gli hai segnato 0 piani, come è possibile che un edificio abbia 0 piani?

grazie e buon mapping

Ciao Stefano,

davvero questo salice si chiama "Rifugio Per Sosta"?

Hi Yog Sot,

I noticed you are duplicating the genus=* value in the species=* tag. Please use the species=* tag for the species only (if it's only a word, is probably a genus). E.g. "Fraxinus" is the genus, "Fraxinus americana", "Fraxinus angustifolia" and "Fraxinus excelsior" are species.

I also noticed sometimes you put the genus in the species=* tag, but an actually species in the species:pl=* tag. E.g. species=Populus + species:pl="Topola włoska" (which is polish for Populus nigra).

I fixed some of these cases

thanks and good mapping

Hi UnusualWorld,

I noticed you added some species=Spruce. What kind of spruce species are they? If the precise species is not known, the value could be rather moved to genus:en.

imho non c'è bisogno di confermare che questo account secondario corrisponde a te in ogni changeset, vedo che c'è già il link nella bio.

Hi Yog Sot,

I noticed some tree have multiple values.
e.g. node/13447296282
this tree has 6 different circumference values. what's it's meaning?

it's a multi stemmed tree, and these are the values of the six trunks
or
in the original source date, there are six different trees in the same coordinates
or
something else?

thanks and good mapping

p.s. is this import documented somewhere?

Hi lecosm,

what's the meaning of height=10-15?
it's a multi stemmed tree, and those are the measures of the two trunks
or
it's a height range, because the real value is unknown?

thanks and good mapping

Hi Yog Sot,

node/13289771282

I guess that building=storage on this tree is an error? or does it have some meaning? I also noticed you used wikidata/wikipedia instead of species:wikidata/species:wikipedia

thanks and good mapping!

Hi G-Wolf,

if these are really information boards, the wikidata values you added should be moved from wikidata/wikipedia to subject:wikidata/subject:wikipedia. If those are trees, they should be remapped as such and the wikidata values should be moved to from wikidata/wikipedia to species:wikidata/species:wikipedia.

thanks and good mapping!

Hi SekeRob, the wikidata links to a plant species, is it an error? or is the species of plant present in this protected area? in such case maybe species:wikidata is a better fit

thanks and good mapping

Is not a problem, but the proper tag is species:wikipedia=*, not wikipedia=*, as explained in the first comment.

An example:
node/9860861396
this element should have
species:wikipedia=fr:Fraxinus angustifolia
instead of
wikipedia=fr:Fraxinus angustifolia

Ops, vedo che è esattamente ciò che hai fatto in questo edit. Avevo visto il precedente ma commentato questo

Ciao Cecchino, se sono chiuse da cancelli forse sarebbe più giusto access=private che access=no?

Hi Emeltet,

there are still at least 338 trees with an incorrect wikipedia value. The tag links to a species page instead of a specific specimen. Do you plan to fix them?

Thanks, and happy mapping.

Hi UNIPEI2025,

the difference circumference values are because it's a multi stemmed tree, or because the original source data had four different trees with the same coordinates?

@fgouget two different trees were merged, I should have fixed it here: changeset/179804620