Hi PcMouse1,

node/11558309736

what's the meaning of "circumference"="canadian amateur radio basic qualification study guide"?

Ciao 3Pappa3,

way/24909483

qua hai indicato che c'è un marciapiede mappato separatamente su un lato della strada, ma non vedo nessun marciapiede mappato separatamente. Un errore?

Sorry, me again… I just noticed that the license of that dataset is CC BY 4.0. I’m wondering how it was imported 10 years ago in the first place. I couldn't find any information in the wiki and in osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue.

… but it was actually “4” in the 2015 dataset, while the other values appear to be correct. I assume the dataset contained some errors, so there’s no way to detect them organically. Since the identifiers seem to have remained the same, they could be used to update the trees with the latest data. That’s outside my capabilities, so I’ll just correct the anomalous values I come across when possible.

Sorry for the many comments. Bye, and happy mapping.

Ok, I’ve just checked this tree in the original source data. In the latest version, its circumference is 1.80. At this point, I don’t know where those other values came from.

species="Fraxinus excelsior" today.

node/3658160942

25 m tall but only 0.04 girth. Again, could be 4 m girth in reality? I'm starting to think that all circumference values added by these user should be multiplied by 100, but after 10 years I'm not sure how to find them.

Hi Des Troisdorfer,

are the trees with height and circumference equal to zero an error in the source data maybe? E.g. changeset/153918464

Could you check it out? Thanks and good mapping

Hi Richard, the standard unit for circumference values in meters. I suppose these are meant to be centimeters? Also is weird 22 trees have the exact same circumference and height, what's the source?

thanks and good mapping

After a year, this time looking at Aesculus hippocastanus trees for my nerdy tree statistics: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:Ivanbranco&oldid=2958848

I noticed this tree: node/3658154622

this tree is 25m tall but its girth is only 0.02. Maybe it was supposed to be 2 instead? I wonder how we can fix all these errors, I see the import author is not active anymore.

Hi Cyril5C,

just curious, what happened to this tree?
was mapped as tree, then tree_stump, then tree again. But the height and circumference value remained the same (they should be changed if a new tree was planted).

Also, the circumference is wrong. Maybe it was supposed to be 1.60?

thanks and good mapping

Per gli elementi ripetuti su diversi piani si può anche utilizzare un solo elemento con repeat_on=*, vedi: repeat_on=*

Ciao lwebmaster,

hanno davvero creato una ciclabile parallela ad un'altra ciclabile? O è un doppione? Vedi ad esempio: way/21776375/history

In generale se al momento dell'upload il sito ti avvisa di differenti 27 errori, sarebbe il caso di fermarsi e capire cosa sia andato storto prima di procedere.

Hi hatul,

node/12924777455
is "אורן" a specific species of Pinus? If not, the correct tag would be genus, not species.

thanks and good mapping

Also the community is preparing the import of the more precise DBSN boundaries, so it would best to just join these efforts: osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/DBSN

If this helps, these are the 1980 values to be fixed: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2kwp

Hi Hervé TUC, seems like you copied the genus value in many species tag, e.g. node/12239558356/history

genus=Malus + species=Malus
species should contain the species only, e.g. species=Malus domestica, =Malus pumila, =Malus sylvestris ecc.

could you please review and correct these import's values?

sorry for the last bbox, it was supposed to edit only the Melbourne values, which I added two years ago

Hi poi-vediamo,

node/13345673920

this tree reference two different genus. Is it genus Washingtonia (as the genus tag says) or Phoenix (as the species tag says)?

thanks and good mapping

Ciao Matteo,

"SuperTramp" è un nome particolare. è un nome utilizzato dai bikers? grazie e buon mapping

Ciao, il tool che utilizzate per caricare i dati sembra avere alcuni problemi.

Invece di modificare la way/83992026 avete modificato un nodo con lo stesso numero, spostandolo dal Nord America all'Italia per un totale di qausi 9000 km. In un altro nodo ha creato quattro tag con nessun valore.

In un altro caso avete cancellato un centro equestre con tanto di indirizzo. Solitamente quando un'attività chiude l'indirizzo rimane valido.