Salve,

ho eliminato le informazioni duplicate dal building, spostato la biblioteca all'interno di suddetto building e ripristinato la posizione precedente del pub, in quanto sembrava essere stato spostato per errore.

Buon mapping

Ciao Maurizio,

ora la relazione ha alcuni buchi e monconi da sistemare, riesci a dargli un'occhiata? https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1471008

Se sono stati controllati manualmente tutti ignora il mio messaggio. Ma avevo già visto i changeset dell'INPS e per scrupolo commento per verificare se sono edit automatici o meno. Buon mapping

Ciao Luciano,

ho controllato il primo risultato in ordine alfabetico, hai cancellato population=0 da Andagna che è mappata con place=village, che da wiki è: "un insediamento urbano più piccolo di una cittadina, tra i 200 e i 10.000 abitanti."

Magari era da correggere con place=locality? Questi elementi andrebbero controllati uno per uno, ora questi casi, che fungevano da cartina tornasole per del QA, sono spariti.

Cosa succede? Prima cambi operator E-distribuzione → E-Distribuzione S.p.A., poi da E-Distribuzione S.p.A. → e-distribuzione S.p.A., poi e-distribuzione S.p.A. → Terna e ora Terna → Terna S.p.A.
Queste modifiche automatiche in tutta Italia sono state discusse con la comunità Italiana?

Ci sono delle linee guide da seguire, che servono anche ad evitare questi pasticci: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans

Hi TKTurbo, thanks for the edits!

the wikimedia_commons=* value should link to a picture or category about the specific element (in this case this specific artwork). For this reason I replaced the wikimedia commons with subject:wikidata=* linking to the Hannekemaaiers Q-Item.

thanks again and good mapping!

Also, based on the picture, seems to be a stolperschwell rather than a stolperstein? memorial=stolperschwelle

the NSI entry uses supermarket: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=supermarket&tt=dpi#dpiu-0cb133

Hi FKaindl,

node/12416052557/history

I'm not really sure subject:wikidata=* should link to the memorial type, but rather to the person/event commemorated in the memorial. Personally I wouldn't even link the stolpersteine Q-Item since it's a repetition of memorial=stolpersteine. What do you think?

Google translated:

Hallo FKaindl,

node/12416052557/history

Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob „subject:wikidata=*“ auf die Art des Denkmals verweisen sollte, sondern eher auf die Person/das Ereignis, an das/das das Denkmal erinnert. Ich persönlich würde nicht einmal auf das Q-Item „Stolpersteine“ verlinken, da es eine Wiederholung von „memorial=stolpersteine“ ist. Was meinen Sie?

Hi relaemanila,

node/730607927/history

this wikimedia_commons value is missing the file extension, I tried with .jpg, .JPG, .png and .PNG without luck. Do you know the proper value?

The website is about this specific Mang Inasal or about the brand? In such case brand:website=* should be used instead of website=* in my opinion.

Thanks for the edits and happy mapping!

I didn't contact them and I'm not a member. I just saw a suspicious edit from a new user.

Can you explain this revert? Another user deleted the same elements just 3 days ago, I tend to assume good faith but this is really suspicious. Also please use good changeset comments, "City adapted" doesn't explain much.

This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/160088437

We should not tag to please the renderers. Imho you have two choices here:
1. create a wikimedia commons category for this element, and tag that
2. upload a new image that is a collage of the other two, so you have both with one link

If you link Wikimedia Commons images as image=* values remember to remove "uselang=nl" at the end, otherwise everyone will have the UI in dutch.

Wikipedia should be used for pages describing the exact object (e.g. we don't add the "Bench" wikipedia page to every bench in OSM).

Hi SonOfZenMaster,

do you have local knowledge of this place? This memorial links to two different memorials images: node/11823004266/history

Would you be able to split it in two different memorials nodes? Thanks for your edits and good mapping!

Google translate:
Szia SonOfZenMaster!

van helyi ismereted erről a helyről? Ez az emlékmű két különböző emlékműhöz kapcsolódik: node/11823004266/history

Fel tudná osztani két különböző emlékműre? Köszönjük a szerkesztéseket és a jó térképezést!

>Heb je het fatsoen gehad om te controleren of de data waar iemand misschien tientallen uren aan heeft gewerkt ergens geback-upt is?

In OSM nothing is "lost". For example, is possible to retrieve the deleted data using Overpass Turbo (e.g. using the [date:"YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"] syntax).

Google Translate:

Ahoj,
Viděl jsem, že jsi upravil max rychlost dvou vleček na 85, z posledního průzkumu si pamatuju, že je tam povolená rychlost mnohem nižší, máš k tomu nějaký zdroj?
Hezký den.
AwFi

Per evitare la duplicazione dell'indirizzo, che in Italia identifica l'ingresso, questo ad esempio era già mappato qua: node/4736077731

Questa metodologia di tagging è conosciuta come Bremen Schema, per quanto mi riguarda la modifica di megaloman è corretta.

Ciao, su OSM le modifiche non si approvano, sono subito live e disponibili. Se ritieni sia errata posso però annullarla quando torno a casa.

Also, why linking a picture from the 70s? There are more recent pictures that could have been linked (e.g. this one is from 2020: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Arch_-_geograph.org.uk_-_6370351.jpg ). Maybe this picture fits better https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ ?

If you are the same person that uploaded this picture(s) on Commons: consider categorizing them, the commons guys could think we are using their hosting space just for OSM, without effort to make the files more indexed in their own database. Adding a "Category:Hafod Arch" would suffice.