After 5 months, I've noticed that there are still 27 areas tagged as such. I was wondering if there are any plans in place to fix them?

7 maggio 2024* non so da dove sia uscita quella data :p

Un altro metodo potrebbe essere quello di controllare se ci sono immagini street-view recenti, ad esempio qua avevo registrato delle foto a fine febbraio dove si vede già la nuova forma: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=393027246657534&focus=photo

buon mapping

Ciao gigi2037,

ho annullato questa modifica perché aveva ripristinato la vecchia forma della rotonda. L'avevo aggiornata solo due giorni fa, se noti nella cronologia dell'elemento l'ultimo changeset era il mio con descrizione "edit forma rotonda", con source=survey;gpx e file gpx allegato.

Quando si trovano situazioni che differiscono dalle immagini satellitari conviene sempre, secondo me, verificare se sono state modificate dopo la data delle immagini satellitari. Ad esempio i metadata di Bing Maps Aerial (che immagino siano quelle che hai usato tu) indicano come data delle immagini: 5 mar 2023 - 22 ago 2023. Mentre la mia modifica era del 9 ago 2024.

Hi Kof Don_2,

what's the meaning of genus="Arbre Sandaré"
Isn't arbree french for "tree"? If yes, are these elements trees or shrubs as mapped?

"Access denied - Access authorization is required"

Notice that the tallest tree recorded is 116m: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperion_(albero)
this is almost the double of it, if the height is correct you just discovered a world record tree

or something else?

Hi rakibdc,

with tree=mahogony you meant
genus=Swietenia (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swietenia)
or
species=Swietenia mahagoni (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swietenia_mahagoni)?

Hi OpenStreetMap-KR,

way/768398467

is there really a glaziery inside the Seoul City Hall?

Apparently this changeset has been reverted here: changeset/151006925

Hi NKA,

node/6899674185/history

this Acer platanoides has circumference 7.10, but the world record for this species is 6.72, maybe it was supposed to be 0.71?

Nearby there are at least 5 trees in the water area, are the imported trees coordinates precise in your experience? In such case we could fix the water area to exclude them or move the trees?

thank and good mapping :)

Hi Hassan,

this tree seem to have an incorrect height (200m), do you know the correct one? thanks and good mapping

Hi Jez,

you added 6 trees with height=stump,
would you agree to remove the height and change them to natural=tree_stump?

thanks and good mapping :)

Hallo srmac,

node/8914825627/history

this tree has an incorrect value, do you know the real one?

thanks and good mapping :)

Hi seanthlin,

node/9060342885/history

this tree have a incorrect height, do you know what's the real one?

thanks and good mapping :)

Hi Matthew,

node/8753912465/history

this tree (and the one nearby) seem to have a wrong height, do you know what's the real value?

thanks and good mapping

Hi Grenzer,

node/8742712067

this tree seems to have a wrong height. Do you know what's the real one?

Thanks and good mapping

Hi assar, thanks for the edits,

I saw there are 5450 trees with height="3 - 5". The wiki says that height should be a number, not a range. Would you agree in moving this value to est_height=*?

thanks and good mapping :)

Hi Plaintelive, I saw you deleted some trees in Bologna and replaced them with a tree row. Singular trees can be part of a tree row ("This approach can also be combined with individually mapped trees for further details."), in my opinion this should be preferred so no detail is lost, such as the number of trees. Also people could contribute adding the circumference for every single tree ecc.

But this is my opninion, thanks for the edits and good mapping!

L'elenco fatto sopra è un'estrazione .csv fatta con Overpass di tutti i valori ancora presenti nel database.

Io sarei per tenerli, alcuni si possono fixare utilizzando species:it come riferimento, per quelli rimanenti si può sempre cancellare la sigla