Hey, just a heads up that this change left some broken junctions that were fixed here: changeset/174087371

Hey Nick,
What's the intention with highway=footway + cycleway=path? cycleway=path doesn't look to be a common tag https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway%3Dpath

I've fixed the disconnected ways here: changeset/174154605

Fixed here: changeset/173995517

Hi,
The "private residence" names look like descriptions more than names. You can use building=detached to indicate they're single family dwellings: building=detached
It's also usually a good idea to square the edges of buildings when tracing in the iD editor unless of course the building has irregular angles, see: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Happy mapping

Hi Connor,
From a routing perspective, I think it makes sense to leave the footway you deleted, although maybe add informal=yes. The grass there is certainly traversable

Yes, exactly. No problem

The incline is about the change in elevation along the direction of the way. This way starts at a lower point at water level and ends at a higher level so the incline is up.

The key-level documentation is better:
incline=*

Please delete it. It was probably a heatmap artifact

This street is bidirection for bikes, i.e oneway:bicycle=no, so it was tagged correctly before. Reverted here: changeset/173547095

Thanks for making these improvements. A couple comments:
- is the surface of the bridge you added actually "ground" or is it wood?
- the name you added for the portage node is better suited for the description tag
Happy mapping

No problem. Happy mapping!

I like the idea. If I'm understanding correctly, I think 10 could be too many separate levels of prominence and it'd be hard to establish a guideline for what separates a landmark=9 from a landmark=10

What does landmark=3/10 mean? I don't see anything about that convention on the wiki

Fulton Market is the name on street signs for this section, which you can see in Streetside imagery. It's also used on the official Chicago GIS maps: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/mapchicago

For routing purposes, it's better to leave the sidewalk as connecting and ending at the road

The crossing on Kinzie is definitely concrete. Please double check your changes

Both sidewalk-alley crossings are clearly concrete in Aerial and streetside imagery

Instead of mulch, I think surface=woodchips is the standard tag, see surface=*. Looks good otherwise

Does this laundromat have a name?