Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please use the changeset description field to leave a message about what you changed and why—for example, "Improved building and address alignment." There's more information here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

"Privacy" isn't a valid reason to entirely remove verified objects from the map. In fact, emergency services have found OSM helpful specifically because it includes off-trail landmarks, paths, and houses that they can use for navigation. See here for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Or the 2nd-to-last bullet point here: osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Especially for such large a bounding box, I'd appreciate more details in the description as to what the tag fix was and why. Like, "Change all 'historic=petroglyph' to 'historic=archaeological_site'+'archaeological_site=petroglyph', a more established tag".

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! Here's a tip: You can automatically make the corners of a building perfectly square by right-clicking it and selecting "square," or by selecting it and pressing "Q" on your keyboard.

Could you please use more descriptive changeset messages? For example, "Added a new dojo according to local knowledge." There are more tips here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Why is access=no necessary? It's already implied from highway=motorway that mopeds, horses, bicycles, and pedestrians are not allowed. See osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions . Adding access=no will tell many apps that don't support detailed access restrictions that the road is closed even to motor vehicles. If you're using an app that thinks highway=motorway is bicycle-accessible, that should be fixed in the app.

Fixed in changeset/130050657

If the buildings have finished being constructed, they should be re-tagged, not deleted.

I think lanes=1 would be better than either oneway=yes or narrow=yes

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! Some feedback: Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another, since that makes it easier to review. Second, you can press the "i" button on a field to read more about what each one is meant to be for. For example, "description" should be used to add additional, factual information about a feature, not your own notes or reviews—see description=* . That wiki has a lot of information in general about what features can be mapped and good practices for mapping them. Finally, the message when you save your changes should describe what you changed and why—see this page for tips: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

The aerial imagery is offset here. Please use the building placement as reference rather than moving them.

It is especially important for changeset that revert existing changes to have a comment describing what they reverted and why.

This is a service road, but it is not a driveway.

"internet_access=wlan" was correct. You changed it to "internet_access=wifi", which is incorrect. internet_access=*

Hello, and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the bounding box small. Also, be sure to use changeset messages that describe what you changed. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Automatische Übersetzung: Hallo und vielen Dank für Ihren Beitrag zu OpenStreetMap! Bitte denken Sie daran, Ihre Änderungen in einem Bereich zu speichern, bevor Sie zu einem anderen wechseln, um den Begrenzungsrahmen klein zu halten. Stellen Sie außerdem sicher, dass Sie Changeset-Meldungen verwenden, die beschreiben, was Sie geändert haben. osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Hello! Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the changeset bounding box small. Also, it looks like you tried to make a multipolygon using a road, but multipolygons are only for closed areas, not linear ways.

(automatische Übersetzung) Hallo! Bitte denken Sie daran, Ihre Änderungen in einem Bereich zu speichern, bevor Sie zu einem anderen wechseln, um den Änderungssatz-Begrenzungsrahmen klein zu halten. Außerdem sieht es so aus, als hätten Sie versucht, ein Multipolygon mit einer Straße zu erstellen, aber Multipolygone sind nur für geschlossene Bereiche, nicht für lineare Wege.

These are clearly not cave entrances.

Please use the changeset description to say what you actually changed. See here for reference: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

The changeset comment needs to be a description of what you changed, not your name. Read this page for some guidance: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, please use descriptive changeset comments. Here is some guidance: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments