Try again, this time with something vaguely resembling civility.

There isn't.

Oh yeah - didn't spot that. The auto-fixer must have throw a hissy. Fixed.

Yeah, sorry - bit grumpier than intended.

It can get a bit wearing dealing with the passive aggression on open source projects.

There are two ways you could have handled this:
1. Christ on a bike, this bloke's added a ton of rights of way in MK that nobody had bothered with before, most of which were completely missing. Let's tidy up the loose ends and move on;
2. The way you chose.
May I politely ask that you develop some inter-presonal skills before communicating with me again?

Actually, looking at this more closely I am going to revise the line a bit. I don't think the MK system has got this one right.

It is the right of way as per the MKCC GIS system (and OS). From the aerial it looks like there *might* be an underpass there (the way OS is drawn seems to imply it), which seems to be the case with the nearby bridleway. Since I won't get down there for ages, fell free to add a "needs survey" fixme, but the line of the route is correct. There are a fair few eccentric ones!