heretofore's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 101425256 | Is Douglas Ave really paving stones? That seems kind of unlikely to me. |
|
| 117665216 | Thanks for your reply! I think we have different expectations with respect to > makes the road unroutable in OSRM. Routing suggested I take the Dulles Access road when it was NOT my destination, and I had set my options to avoid tolls. After the trip, I went to look up the tagging, which is how I found your changeset. I understand that you want to make the route available to your drivers when they go to/from the airport, but I would also like not to be routed into a rules-breaking situation. We don't want drivers to be surprised by the suggested route and have to divert dynamically to avoid a traffic violation. This could include Lyft drivers, too. If successful destination routing requires either a start or end point within continuous destination-tagged roads, perhaps the rest of the airport should also be tagged. Thank you for your consideration,
|
|
| 117665216 | Can you comment on why the access=destination tag was removed? The road clearly says it's only for Airport traffic. |
|
| 124073966 | Is anyone going to mind if I do them slowly and incrementally? I'm just an iD user (plus StreetComplete, which doesn't help here). |
|
| 124073966 | I don't know which set to keep, but we now have 2 sets of all the NIH buildings. Is there a good way to pick and consolidate them? |
|
| 121551323 | They're getting rid of the insane blind corner by the river? Finally! |
|
| 122978961 | I haven't (intentional) moved any protected area boundaries since the time that we talked about. I have, however snapped landuse edges to them for residential/commercial/industrial. If the protected area abuts the zoning, it is demonstrably the edge of the area. I did stop snapping for natural features like wood/stream/etc. since those change independently of human zoning. |
|
| 96793031 | Excellent. Thank you! |
|
| 96793031 | Yes, sorry. I should have included the link to relation/12122181 |
|
| 96793031 | There's a broken poly just south of the dam. |
|
| 120479989 | Hi. If you're going to turn traffic island nodes into pairs of one-way streets, can you fix the relations on the roads that now have a one-way segment in them with no return path? |
|
| 111700973 | Thanks for correcting it! I had been using the Mapbox images at the time because they had the best resolution and foliage penetration... until I found a place where I knew there were recent IRL changes. Then I realized that the MD map had more recent data and started that instead. Mea culpa. |
|
| 112668602 | Thanks. Is there guidance on where to put "alternative" or "connector" segments of a route in the order? |
|
| 112668602 | I think the cycle portion of RCG should end at the pavement. The hikers can continue up north. You can't take a casual bike on the unpaved part north of the Beltway. |
|
| 111698981 | Thanks. Is this right? changeset/111916814 I assume you meant "Forest Glen," not "Forrest Park." |
|
| 111547232 | I haven't been to Paint Branch, but that may also be nice. |
|
| 111547232 | Northwest Branch Trail for unpaved. See inbox for details. Sligo Creek (not SVP?) and Rock Creek are paved. |
|
| 108895521 | The boundaries go through people's houses now. |
|
| 82198873 | Feel free to revert. |
|
| 99396523 | It doesn't appear green on OSM.org, except in places where I painstakingly filled in the ground cover. I guess I'll have to keep doing that, then. |