Thank you for adding details to the library here. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the building. In OSM there should only be one feature mapped for each real world feature. The additional details you are adding should be included on the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166703

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166706

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166705

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166702

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166701

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166700

As I commented on another changeset, you are adding details to a new feature but it is already mapped. The details should be added to the existing feature.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166699

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166605

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166599

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166598

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166596

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166595

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166593

As I mentioned on another changeset, the details of the parking lot should be added to the existing way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132166592

Thank you for adding details of this parking lot. However, it is already mapped as a way outlining the lot. In OSM there should be only one feature for each real world feature, so the details should be added to the way that already exists.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132164798

I'm a little bit lost on the bike lane tagging myself. It shows correctly in Streetcomplete's UI. Are you seeing issues on a data consumers end?

I noticed that you had changed the bike tagging on the sidewalk here. It was mapped as using the sidewalk because the bike route continues east on Saint Marks Ave, but does so by using the section of sidewalk and crosswalks across Eastern Parkway and Rockaway Avenue.

If you are converting the POI to a point, please also remove the amenity=pub tag from the building. Right now this reflects on the map as if there are 2 pubs and one is missing a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130305961

I don't see a source mentioned in your changeset. It is helpful to add this, especially in a case like this where I am not seeing what you mapped on aerial imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130305603

Gnome Maps may cache the data so your edit is not showing up there yet. Everything looks correct to me now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130198502