Please do not use name to describe age limits. If you know the limits, please use min_age and max_sge min_age=*

If you don't know the limits, just add a note giving information you used to make this distinction, i.e. provide the underlying facts, not the guesses you made based on them.

Please do not use name= to describe the feature. If it doesn't have a name, don't include one.

Please don't use name for a description. If you don't know the name, leave it out.

Also, if you don't know the building type, use building=yes and include any further information as a note.

See note/206249

These aren't public footpaths. The highest conceivable access rating is destination, but I think they are probably best considered private. As such, they are difficult to, legally, verify on the ground.

The whole estate is NHS land and not a public highway.

This effectively reverses a change I made. I believe it is incorrect to map a path on top of a pedestrian area. The paths were already linked by the pedestrian area, both on the map, and in real life. If routing software cannot cope with that, the routing software is at fault.