What I say definitely is related to the changeset. I have examined the changeset. You’ve fixed weird values of surface= all over the world. That’s a good change, but it doesn’t need to be done in one changeset. Submitting these changes in multiple changesets, one per country, is possible and many other people manage to do so with their edits using JOSM.

Did you read the wiki page’s reasons for why submitting changesets over large geographical areas is not great? This changeset will be showing up in many, many people’s osmcha feeds. That means that either tens of people will spend time reviewing this changeset even though it’s probably unrelated to their editing area; or *nobody* will review it because it’s too big and they all think someone else will review it.

If problems are found with your changes in one country, you risk the rest of the valid changes in the changeset being reverted as a result.

Yes it is. In JOSM, select the modified objects in a single country (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/41728/in-josm-can-one-select-objects-within-a-given-country-outline, or just do it manually), then ‘Upload selection’

Smaller changeset areas please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hi. Do you have local knowledge of the changes you’ve made here to fix the warnings from ID? The tagging changes you’ve made to delete a bird hide, change a transformer and change a sundial don’t look correct to me. (I have local knowledge of this area.)

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

The tagging for the Underpass was actually correct before: it used the conditional access tagging scheme described at access=*#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions to say that motor vehicles other than buses aren’t allowed 08:00-20:00.

The fact the motor_vehicle= tag wasn’t set was confusing, though, so I’ve changed it to set motor_vehicle=no by default, and made the conditional access yes between 20:00-08:00. changeset/113087136

Thanks for your edits, and please do continue to edit :)

Thanks for the edits! This changeset is quite hard to review due to combining multiple types of change in multiple geographic areas over the UK. Could you please split your changesets into smaller geographical areas in future, and make a new changeset for each kind of change you’re making? For example, the tagging changes for marshes could be separate from adding new marshes, which could be separate from fixing ID suggestions in North Wales. See osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks

Hi, can you please give your reasoning for making this change?

It directly undoes a recent UK-wide change by DaveF to remove landuse tagging from golf courses, which as I understand things is correct.

In addition, adding the hole numbers as name= is not correct according to the wiki: golf=hole. The hole numbers are already tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:ref=.

Hi, I’ve reverted this change because it’s obviously wrong. You’ve changed a car park into a building.

Please can you explain what you’re trying to achieve? Perhaps the rest of the community can help? Thanks.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please try and make future changesets a bit smaller? This one covers most of the area of England, which makes it hard for other local mappers to review, as they end up looking at changes outside their local area. Splitting it into multiple changesets, one for (say) each town/city you’re editing would be great.

Note that you can also select a building and press the ‘q’ key to automatically square its corners, which makes it easier to draw regular buildings.

Thanks, and happy editing :)

This route? osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=54.2682%2C-2.7882%3B54.2432%2C-2.7694#map=14/54.2558/-2.7786&layers=N

If so, I think there must be a bug in Garmin Connect. I’ve checked the data in OSM and, unless I’m misunderstanding the interpretation of turn:lanes:backward, I think it’s all correct.

Hi, thanks for editing OpenStreetMap! I don’t think this edit can be correct, as the number of lanes on the road at this point is definitely 3: one lane in either direction, plus a turning lane in the middle. I’ve reverted your change for this reason.

We’ll have to find a different way of fixing the cycle routing problem. What routing software are you using, and how does it fail to route?

Ta

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your local knowledge!

It looks like there are quite a few dragged nodes in this changeset, where you’ve accidentally moved a shop/fence/solar panel from one place to another. Please watch out for that in future if you can. I’ve fixed these dragged nodes so everything’s fine now.

Please also make separate edits for separate areas — so in this case one edit for your changes to Lancaster, and one for your changes to Kirkby Lonsdale. That makes it easier for other local mappers to review changes without seeing areas they’re not familiar with.

Thanks again for adding your local knowledge to the map, and please continue to do so :)

Looks pretty neat to me!

Be my guest :)

That seems pretty convincing! I should have checked the school’s website, sorry. Thanks for your work on schools recently :)

Heya, seems a bit odd that the name now includes ‘Penrith’. I can’t check locally but it seems pretty unlikely that’s going to be on the signage at the school. Where did the name data come from? Ta

Heya, thanks for this. Just a quick note that when mapping terraced/semidetached houses, the nodes for the joined walls should be joined together. The editor will have given you a warning like ‘house crosses house’ about this. I’ll fix these houses, but please make sure to join the nodes in future, thanks :)

Hi, I’m wondering why this was necessary. The layer key only defines an order for overlapping ways which are not joined with a node, and I don’t think that’s the case for any of the ways you’ve added the key to (where it was unset before) here.

I fixed it for you in changeset/109898859 then