typo in previous comment - apply the regexp replace:

s/documentation is incorrect/documentation is the incorrect tagging method/

Also want to note that iD also added

resolved:mismatched_geometry:area_as_line

indicating that someone wrote in the validators that I did correct an outstanding issue, so we have a serious disconnect here. I still believe the documentation is incorrect and the sole "correct" way is to use the older tagging system as long as we don't know the actual area to do the indoor tagging.

If you have an example of another indoor=corridor mapping in some other mall or whatnot, please show me and let me see if there are any validator errors on that, and I'll see how to match it if it does not give validator errors.

In that webpage indor=corridor says it should be an area. So should the wiki documentation need to be changed too?

Hi, Thank you for adding what you see on the road to OSM. I did have a comment: I noticed you added a few turn restrictions and currently they're being flagged with errors and will be ignored by driving routers. Turn restrictions are relations that should contain three members: a from, a via, and to. These tell what should be restricted or enforced for people on the from street, that go through the via, and head to the to street. May need to revisit these turn restrictions and add the appropriate members. Let me know if this doesn't make sense. Thanks!

Hi, I think this aerodrome POI that was added here at node/9438483221 is already mapped as an area at way/368683795 . It depends on the render whether it shows up as the proper name, so it's not necessary to tag it again here?

ack. too far apart. sigh, should save individually...

BTW the original issue is that some of these ways were marked as indoor=corridor and the requirement is that this should be a closed area instead of a way. Based on the locations of the shops this couldn't be an area so I thought this was the best way to tag them. Is there a better way?

I think I might have made an error here, I noticed some issues in osmi that I haven't figured out how to fix... were there any specifics that were problematic?

Note to original drawing layout: we're not supposed to draw for the renderer and I'm sorry, on the flat OSM map the house should look like a rectangle. However you can study how to draw 3d buildings and get it to render nicely on f4map or osmbuildings, I put in a first pass schwag at drawing something that sort of looks like this house but not exactly. Feel free to improve on it.

oops didn't realize they were so far apart....

I fixed in changeset/115229508, hope this is correct, cant see imagery

Ah I see relation/13658266 which captures the information I was expecting to see at the intersection. I think relation/10668540 can/should be deleted. Thanks for the update!

If anyone finds an issue with this path/changeset due to the deletion, this route is now marked as relation/13659236 which highlights the original cycle path. The original cycle path was a data violation due to having two traversable ways drawn on top of each other. Feel free to name this new relation - the original path did not have a name.

Hi, I don't understand this relation: relation/13564790 - what are you trying to describe here?

Hi, I was wondering about relation/10668540 - it's incomplete. I think you're local, could you describe this turn restriction, is it eastbound SW Scholls Ferry Rd turning left/north to SW Mountainside Wy or southbound SW Mountainside Wy turning left/east to SW Scholls Ferry Rd, or both?

Hey, I was wondering about the turn restriction here. First off I'm not local and don't know all Canadian traffic laws. However trying to interpret the signs around this intersection I see that Valhalla Inn Road actually seems to have TRs prohibiting entry from the east from The East Mall. This kind of makes sense because VIR appears to be mainly an off ramp from Hwy427 Collector. The turnaround there means anyone going west on VIR is forced to turn around so going west is pointless.
Thus my interpretation: the TR placed at the intersection seems it needs to be rotated CCW 90 degrees so that people coming from the condos do not try to go to the pointless turn around if they try to head west. Same with people leaving from 1 Valhalla trying to take a left and likewise going west.
If you're local and understand this otherwise let me know, but this looks a bit weird.

feel free to revert to assist in fixing changeset/112564056 and the other mess in this region

I did not realize the extent of the import problems and started to hand fix for maproulette in changeset/114769896 - I will revert my change so this changeset can be fixed in another way

This has a lot of broken polygons in it. I think I may have to undo my manual hand fix (maproulette, changeset/114769896) in order for you to systemically fix this.

Is way/1007906412 really a roundabout? Seems to be too small and turning in the wrong direction. You may know more about this driveway but I'm not sure if junction=roundabout makes sense here.