very well, it shall go poof.

moge subsequently closed in the 10 months you had the note open?

What is the brand of the convenience store, this still hasn't been answered. Also the relation relation for it makes no sense, the transit station relation is for the building and not for station.

Are these already built and on the ground? Please be aware that your edits are visible by everyone in the world!

BTW, if interested or for fun, search for Hygiene, Colorado - that's how I'd expect an unincorporated area gets mapped since there's no real boundary that tells who needs to pay taxes or not. They even have a fire department and a post office...

It was indeed someone else but brought up a very good point. I'm not familiar with California unincorporated areas but things but most of the unincorporated pseudo-cities Colorado don't have administrative boundaries since they were always ad-hoc. It's weird that California Park had a boundary which implies there is some government but if it's arbitrarily added to if some land owner says so, then there's really no boundary...

Cool, just wanted to verify since the anonymous user did bring up a point:
Usually administrative boundaries means there's an administration or some form of low level government, so perhaps this label might not be best, alas, I don't know what's the best way or maybe this is fine, but just wanted to make sure.

Could you respond to note/4320005 - is there a better way to tag this?

node/11967069540 as well, though it does have the south college avenue number correct... not sure where/how the 14a applies... they have their unique address already and the subunits have a 100- number...

About node/11967069541 -- where did this data come from, I think this is obsolete since the rebuilding of this area?

Fair enough, just wanted to make sure someone didn't add a new restaurant but the old one was still there, as much as I dislike two restaurants sharing the same cash register... but they are both the same parent company franchiser...

Are these all really closed? I spot checked
way/185707011 and KFC's website still indicates one here -- and coupled with the shops that share a KFC and a TB (I know of one locally, also a KFC that shares a building/cash register with an A&W) -- just wanted to verify whether things are correct...

I also have my doubts that this is a fence. Fences are usually straight and either follow property lines or natural features and this is neither - however it does track something that's being walked upon so that this is some sort of trail at least for part of the way. Clarification is needed.

Hey, you deleted Fort Collins. Reverting.

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

TBH I think this isn't such a big deal though prefer it's more than just one structure. Yeah it would be nice it was public (i.e. not access=private) but it is still a playground and it's on the ground, so it gets mapped just like a private road.

Do you remember if you split up the connection between east main street and west main street that was separated at that railway crossing? Was this done by accident or was there a reason for it?

note/4250670

Hi
I don't think the bridge is needed in this case. This location looks like the sidewalk/roads are over a culvert or water tunnel and was fine without the bridge. Actually it's currently wrong to have both a bridge and a culvert (since there's now nothing at level=0) -- probably should revert.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap where contributions are always welcome. However I don't think this is mapped properly - it surely is not a lake. It can be changed to a private swimming pool but the location and size is not available at the moment. Could you change this to a swimming pool and whose pool is it, there are clearly fences around all these lots, and this water is over the fences...

Thanks for adding the business, though I changed it to a veterinary instead of a hospital, seems more fitting.