Hi, was inspecting way/1510382977 and as the note note/5266355 said, this is a mini-roundabout and should not be split up with flares or a circular path because ...well, they don't exist, and this probably should be reverted. Was this not the case and there was a non-traversable circle in the roundabout?

This is a bad edit and will be reverted.

IMHO I don't think trees should be part of a relation for a residential area even though it might not be a place to live. By the fact that the tree area is "inside" the polygon for the residential area, by default they are related since they can't move...
Also the two springs park is now no longer a residential park as it's "not part" of the residential neighborhood (implying people not part of the neighborhood are free to drive there and use it) so I'd also leave that out of the multipolygon relation. But that's my two cents.

Isn't this duplicate of node/8089966550 ? Perhaps need to merge the two or something

forgot to also indicate for reviewers: also removed some roads that aren't showing up in recent satellite imagery.

Chances are it will not be residential in a retail area...

I'd probably not have the name of the establishment on the building since it's also on the landuse, it's assumed that all buildings inside of a landuse is related so it's redundant (and carto renders it funny with the name listed twice)... just a comment about naming...

I just noticed that the "bank" at way/1265437036 (see note tag and https://locators.bankofamerica.com/co/fortcollins/atm-fort-collins-111015.html) that was merged into a building is only an ATM, and probably should not have been made into a way and kept as a POI... revert?

Thanks! Sorry I started making some changes but then noticed you got some so I abandoned my edits so we don't collide.
Thanks again for taking care of it all!

urk. Should use ref=x instead the "descriptive name" of name="building x"

Just wanted to let you know that King Soopers near Drake & College was already mapped and you added another duplicate POI... did you have data where it didn't exist?

This name is more of a descriptive name which shouldn't be used for names. Rather, the operation should be called a "farm" of sorts and cannabis being their crop.

Hi, welcome to OSM. I just want to apologize that I deleted your baseball diamond. The baseball field was already drawn and that's what we normally map for baseball pitches, and having two on top of each other is kind of confusing. If you want to include the sandy/dirt areas there are some examples elsewhere, I'll try to point you to an example if I come across it, but they shouldn't be marked as a pitch.

(and the geographical area of the changeset...well... standard comment about the size this goes here...)

Just a minor comment. I see you fixed some poorly mapped "forests" and you're completely right that they should not be mapped the way they were, thanks for fixing that. However next time, could you also indicate this fact in the changeset comment? Just commenting on the "mass deletions" even if its just a hundred nodes because it triggers peoples' "spidey senses" of vandalism detection.

thanks I put in note/4864455, windows were all boarded up, just didnt have enough time to login.