fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 180444996 | Hi, you've created a multipolygon with a single member, you should just move the landuse and name tags to the way.
|
|
| 180434792 | Businesses shouldn't be mapped in OSM if they don't have a physical presence someone can just walk up to.
|
|
| 180072462 | Hi, can you please use a more descriptive changeset description than just "improvements"? osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some more information
|
|
| 179963939 | Hi, the farmland landuses you've drawn don't match up to the actual farmland boundaries, and the house is both traced wrong and has way too many nodes.
|
|
| 179701792 | Hi, these two roads should be joined up as this is a petrol station, the building in between them is just a roof.
|
|
| 179750926 | Hi, the roadway doesn't curve in the way you've shown, can you please redraw this to show the actual roadway and not a turn into a specific property.
|
|
| 179761311 | Hi, what imagery did you use for this, since ESRI shows a former carpark now under construction, and Bing doesn't line up with what you've drawn?
|
|
| 179284064 | Hi, there appears to be barriers going across sections of roadways you've drawn, it might be best to confirm with street level imagery or with better quality aerial imagery.
|
|
| 179199491 | Revert edit made with outdated imagery to restore the roundabout that now exists |
|
| 179199491 | I've confirmed that the ESRI imagery is 2025 whereas Bing is 2020, so I'll reverted this to restore the roundabout. |
|
| 179199491 | Hi, ESRI shows that this is actually a roundabout. Usually that is newer than Bing, have you been here and confirmed there isn't a roundabout? Otherwise, this should probably be reverted back to the roundabout.
|
|
| 179110148 | They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding.
|
|
| 179106110 | Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached.
|
|
| 179041147 | Hi, I don't think this would be considered a pipestem, it looks to just be a single rural property.
|
|
| 178970917 | Hi, the path normally should extend to the roadway (and be joined to the way for that roadway) if they do join up through a kerb.
|
|
| 178763845 | Hi Jaroro, the format for phone numbers should be +61 421 024 435 for mobile numbers, and +61 8 8323 7594 for landlines.
|
|
| 178662718 | Hi, highway=path is more generic than highway=footway. If something is designed mostly for foot traffic but bicycles are still allowed, it should be kept as highway=footway and then bicycle=yes added to it.
|
|
| 178433769 | Hi, if the greens and other objects are inside the fairway, they should ideally be drawn as a multipolygon, otherwise you're actually drawing those areas as being both greens/bunkers and fairway at the same time.
|
|
| 178384855 | Hi, your address on your website doesn't match this location. It also appears to be a residential location, is this an office where someone can come to at any time between 8am and 10pm Monday to Sunday?
|
|
| 178366608 | Hi, ESRI imagery shows this driveway going through a building, can you please align it correctly?
|