Hi, your address on your website doesn't match this location. It also appears to be a residential location, is this an office where someone can come to at any time between 8am and 10pm Monday to Sunday?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178384855

Hi, ESRI imagery shows this driveway going through a building, can you please align it correctly?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178366608

Hi, this is still incorrect, you can see where the road deviates from what you've drawn, can you please correct this. The road is visible enough through the trees to draw this accurately.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178334743

Hi, you've also changed way/193087873 to be access=no, was this intentional, considering there are houses along here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178304362

The node has also been placed on the road, this should be detatched and moved to the correct location.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178319412

This seems incorrect, the road goes straight through a number of buildings according to Bing imagery. I've deleted it, please re-draw it correctly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178265352

Hi, can you make sure your changeset comments are relevant to the change, this looks like it's a template used for whenever you add a road or make a highway classification change, and doesn't make it obvious which of the two it actually is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177790281

Hi, you've merged a node used for Waldeck Oval with a node used in an administrative boundary way, these should be separate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177792402

Hi, these two nodes are still in the relation for the Glenelg Tram as stops, they should be removed and the new ones added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177703507

Hi there,

That makes sense, what you had written your comment didn't quite line up to your edit, and so I did assume your intention was to remove the relation entirely, not just one part, and that the partial change was a mistake. Thanks for confirming otherwise!

DWG revert - sockpuppet edits

changeset/177666932

DWG revert - sockpuppet edits

changeset/177666932

DWG revert - sockpuppet edits

changeset/177666932

DWG revert - sockpuppet edits

changeset/177666932

DWG revert - sockpuppet edits

changeset/177666932

Hi, you've only removed a single way from the relation, not removed the relation.

The source you've linked doesn't appear to be one we can actually used, unless it's been released under an appropriate license (and the PDF itself doesn't state that). It also still shows Microcarpa Hike with nothing to show it's been removed.

Can you confirm with an appropriate source that it's been removed (so the whole relation can be removed), otherwise this should be reverted to add that removed way back in.

Houses are assumed to be private, you can add access=private if you're concerned, but "Private Residence" as a name is just incorrect, we don't use the name tag for descriptive names, only actual names.

Hi, the private residence name shouldn't be added in here, that should just be drawn as a house without that as a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630980

Hi, adding nodes with nothing but a name isn't really ideal. I'd add a primary tag so they are actually classed as something.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630924

Hi, are these actually signed with the words "Water Tank" on them? Even if so, I don't think adding that as a name is any value, it's not a unique or distinctive name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630722