Removed in changeset/173859225

Hi, were each of these checked before making this change? It seems like you have, but an edit focused on a couple of tags and this wide often ends up being an automated edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173683055

Hi, when adding links to OSM, please don't add utm tags to the URL
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173697868

Hi, the oneway=-1 should be fixed up, if you added the tag then reversed the way in JOSM, then you should tell it not to change that tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173766175

Hi, why has gold=water_hazard been added to the entire Murray River relation?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777581

Thanks for doing that!

OpenStreetMap is a geospatial database, how things are rendered are up to those who consume that data. The rendering shown on openstreetmap.org is just an example rendering designed for mapper feedback. We don't change tags or delete objects based on how they show on one specific rendering.

If these are seasonal, there is the seasonal tag used to show this, which might change how other data consumers then show those objects, and that's how these issues should be corrected, not just deleting them.

You say you've "fixed the map", but at this stage, I don't think I'd agree based on your comments. If these wetlands don't exist at all, that's fine, but you'd need to say that, and if someone queries the removal, engage in good faith.

I've had a look at aerial imagery, and these areas do look like they resemble wetlands, so this might need to be reverted, and then tagged more appropriately.

On the topic of incorrect street names, the great thing is that you can just come on here and change it! You don't need to ask Google and hope they get it right eventually, you can do it yourself.

DWG revert - vandalism from new mapper

changeset/173696268

DWG revert - vandalism from new mapper

changeset/173696268

I'm just wondering what the source for the change is, or if there was a discussion? For quite a while, name has been United States, int_name is United States of America.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173583310

There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173652514

There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173652933

@dmjab13, it's a revert of a number of changesets, these changesets often end up large just because it's quite time consuming to break them down geographically, or because one of the original changesets is large.

Hi, only one end of this road is attached to the actual road. I'd also recommend combining the short segment with the larger one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173331238

Please discuss this with the community on the most recent changeset regarding that object (other than this one), or on the community forum.

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868

DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

changeset/173296868