OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173652933 | OpenStreetMap is a geospatial database, how things are rendered are up to those who consume that data. The rendering shown on openstreetmap.org is just an example rendering designed for mapper feedback. We don't change tags or delete objects based on how they show on one specific rendering. If these are seasonal, there is the seasonal tag used to show this, which might change how other data consumers then show those objects, and that's how these issues should be corrected, not just deleting them. You say you've "fixed the map", but at this stage, I don't think I'd agree based on your comments. If these wetlands don't exist at all, that's fine, but you'd need to say that, and if someone queries the removal, engage in good faith. I've had a look at aerial imagery, and these areas do look like they resemble wetlands, so this might need to be reverted, and then tagged more appropriately. On the topic of incorrect street names, the great thing is that you can just come on here and change it! You don't need to ask Google and hope they get it right eventually, you can do it yourself. |
|
| 173670588 | DWG revert - vandalism from new mapper |
|
| 173670089 | DWG revert - vandalism from new mapper |
|
| 173583310 | I'm just wondering what the source for the change is, or if there was a discussion? For quite a while, name has been United States, int_name is United States of America.
|
|
| 173652514 | There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
|
|
| 173652933 | There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
|
|
| 173656608 | @dmjab13, it's a revert of a number of changesets, these changesets often end up large just because it's quite time consuming to break them down geographically, or because one of the original changesets is large. |
|
| 173331238 | Hi, only one end of this road is attached to the actual road. I'd also recommend combining the short segment with the larger one.
|
|
| 173296868 | Please discuss this with the community on the most recent changeset regarding that object (other than this one), or on the community forum. |
|
| 173296757 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296695 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296685 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296664 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296649 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296587 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296574 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 173296564 | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus |
|
| 172764914 | Hi ZLima12, If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth. I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this. Kind regards,
|
|
| 172934259 | Hi matthewfecica, If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth. I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this. Kind regards,
|
|
| 172938812 | Hi, same as my comment on the other changeset, but in this case I'd separate the building out into it's own object with just building=yes, and remove it from the outside way.
|