OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 183470535 | Hi aerial imagery still shows a dog-leg at the intersection, has this been removed recently?
|
|
| 183327243 | When you say this doesn't officially exist, is there some kind of spot here where you can stop still? If so, then it should probably remain mapped in some form. Removing the parking is fair, the rest_stop there's arguments either way in that it's not officially one, but it's somewhat become one. The highway should remain, maybe as a short highway=track if anything, but there is something there that exists (according to aerial imagery at least).
|
|
| 183274269 | Adding smaller segments of wood like you have here is incorrect. You shouldn't map for a specific editor, just like you shouldn't map for a specific router/renderer. If you need to make a large boundary easier to work with in other editors, I'd recommend splitting the large way into multiple segments and then using them to make a multipolgyon. This changeset should be reverted, along with any other similar edits.
|
|
| 183210854 | Thanks for the explanation. If you do think you can determine it from aerial imagery then that's fine, I mostly just wanted to see if there was a way it was determined or if it was just picked from a preset. |
|
| 183146660 | Somehow OSMCha had an invisible horizontal scroll that perfectly cut off the word Chicken, my apologies! |
|
| 183146660 | Hi, was removing Chicken from the name intentional? Their website still includes it. Also, postcode and suburb aren't necessary in AU.
|
|
| 183198985 | Hi, what is the source for this? I can't find anything about Schoenthal in SA other than a winery?
|
|
| 183199815 | Hi, what's the source for this new suburb? I can't find anything indicating it exists
|
|
| 183202918 | Hi, is there a reason why Beadell Street has been split into a bunch of short segments? You don't need to split a way for a road where another comes off of it, routers can handle that fine.
|
|
| 183210854 | Hi, what are you using to determine the content of tanks?
|
|
| 183001676 | I would say that way/49903202 needs to be split. The portion in the caravan park is permissive, but from the beach up to the walking/cycle track is public.
|
|
| 182999229 | Hi, the highway=unclasssified should be a highway=service and service=driveway going all the way along the driveway. For the walkway, I'm not sure if there's value in mapping that, but if so, it should be access=private. access=no means nobody can go there legally, even the owners in this case.
|
|
| 182934049 | Restored in changeset/182952143 |
|
| 182951832 | Revert own revert, misunderstood direction of move |
|
| 182934049 | Ahh, I got the directions around the wrong way. I'll revert my revert then. |
|
| 182913296 | Hi, parking=yes is an incorrect tag, if you're trying to specify this location has parking, then the parking area should be mapped separately.
|
|
| 182934049 | Revert changeset that moved a node to another continent |
|
| 182934049 | Hi, you've moved a node a significantly large distance, I can only assume this was a mistake? I've reverted this change based on that assumption. |
|
| 182935873 | Hi, you've mentioned Google Imagery as a source, can you confirm what this means? We aren't allowed to use Google Maps as a source, both satellite and their maps.
|
|
| 182871831 | Hi, if that road is a driveway, then it probably shouldn't have the name or maxspeed.
|