Hi, you've marked these as monorails, is this the best tag for these? There's probably something that better describes what these objects physically are, as railway=monorail would generally be used for a full track, not two short physical rails.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181229035

These aren't a house=terrace. They should also be mapped as individual houses, not as one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181212189

You've dragged a couple of nodes in this edit, can you restore those to their previous location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181214495

You've missed a digit, plus the formatting should be +61 481 775 831. Mobiles are grouped as 3 x 3 digits, landlines are area code by itself then 2 x 4 digits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180745873

Hi, aerial imagery still shows a building here, has that been demolished recently or was removing building=yes a mistake?

There's also some issues with how these buildings have been drawn, can you please clean these up to follow the building outline and not overlap with the fences (which may require adjusting the fence positions if needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180699799

Hi, you've created a multipolygon with a single member, you should just move the landuse and name tags to the way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180444996

Businesses shouldn't be mapped in OSM if they don't have a physical presence someone can just walk up to.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180434792

Hi, can you please use a more descriptive changeset description than just "improvements"? osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some more information
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180072462

Hi, the farmland landuses you've drawn don't match up to the actual farmland boundaries, and the house is both traced wrong and has way too many nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179963939

Hi, these two roads should be joined up as this is a petrol station, the building in between them is just a roof.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179701792

Hi, the roadway doesn't curve in the way you've shown, can you please redraw this to show the actual roadway and not a turn into a specific property.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179750926

Hi, what imagery did you use for this, since ESRI shows a former carpark now under construction, and Bing doesn't line up with what you've drawn?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179761311

Hi, there appears to be barriers going across sections of roadways you've drawn, it might be best to confirm with street level imagery or with better quality aerial imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179284064

Revert edit made with outdated imagery to restore the roundabout that now exists

changeset/179232515

I've confirmed that the ESRI imagery is 2025 whereas Bing is 2020, so I'll reverted this to restore the roundabout.

Hi, ESRI shows that this is actually a roundabout. Usually that is newer than Bing, have you been here and confirmed there isn't a roundabout? Otherwise, this should probably be reverted back to the roundabout.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179199491

They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110148

Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179106110

Hi, I don't think this would be considered a pipestem, it looks to just be a single rural property.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179041147