OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177630924

Houses are assumed to be private, you can add access=private if you're concerned, but "Private Residence" as a name is just incorrect, we don't use the name tag for descriptive names, only actual names.

177630980

Hi, the private residence name shouldn't be added in here, that should just be drawn as a house without that as a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630980

177630924

Hi, adding nodes with nothing but a name isn't really ideal. I'd add a primary tag so they are actually classed as something.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630924

177630722

Hi, are these actually signed with the words "Water Tank" on them? Even if so, I don't think adding that as a name is any value, it's not a unique or distinctive name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630722

177633597

DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

177633577

DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

177613994

DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

177613948

DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

177613923

DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

177281864

Hi, looks like there's a typo in the house number for way/1467491633
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177281864

177202796

Hi there, this looks pretty good, only thing would be that if 2 and 4 Winchester Street don't share a wall, they shouldn't be joined together. If iD is wanting to snap them together, I'm happy to help fix that with JOSM or another editor.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177202796

177130181

Hi, the section you've marked as service, is this just a one lane section? If so, it should probably still be residential and just tagged as a single lane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177130181

177048763

Hi, you've attached the corner of way/1465772868 to the park next to it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177048763

177050198

Hi, when you're drawing buildings, it's a good idea to click the building outline once you've drawn it, and then press Q to square it off.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177050198

177053624

Hi there, for the changeset comment, it's better to describe what you're actually changing, otherwise it's not really giving any information to anyone. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some good examples.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177053624

177069754

Hi, the wikidata tag should use the Q ID, not the name of the item.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177069754

176939353

I've fixed them up in changeset/176962528 for an example of how building=house should be drawn.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176939353

176847619

Hi, since there's no physical split in the road, this shouldn't be mapped as two separate sections. Painted islands aren't counted for physical splits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176847619

176551989

I agree with JoeG, just because the terminology is American, it doesn't make the tag invalid and is commonly used in Australia. Those footway=sidewalk tags should all be restored.

On the split road, that really comes down to local preference. For a small island like that I generally wouldn't bother, but it's something that might be worth a discussion in the forum to see if there's a preference one way or the other.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176551989

176693411

Is "office=game development" a commonly used tag? I don't think it really is, this should probably go back to office=it, and a relevant sub-tag added if one exists.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176693411