This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source

If this is now a through road open to the public, you'll need to remove access=private.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745524

Hi, you'd generally want to place the node inside of the building, not on the building. The opening hours also need be for office, not the business as a whole. Is this office open for anyone to walk into?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169712443

Hi, phone numbers in OSM have to be formatted a certain way, for landlines it would be +61 8 8113 3240 for this object, and an example for mobiles would be +61 400 123 456.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169713829

Hi, oneway=no is implied by the lack of a oneway=yes tag, there isn't really a need to tag it unless it's a single lane road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169701136

Hi Brareu68, phone numbers need to be formatted in a certain way on OSM, for landlines it will be +61 8 8595 5796 for this one, and an example for mobiles would be +61 412 345 678.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169642493

Hi, have you checked if any of these are already mapped as relations, as per my comment on your Nepean Bay changeset?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169530829

Hi, Nepean Bay is already mapped as relation/6669182, you could add this as a label node in that relation as per osm.wiki/Relation:boundary
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536327

osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

Hi there, when you're editing items that already exist, it's best to keep the existing item and change it, instead of deleting it and creating a new version. I can see a couple of paths that have been deleted and new ones mapped along the same route.

(translated with DeepL)

Здравствуйте, при редактировании уже существующих элементов лучше сохранить существующий элемент и изменить его, а не удалять и создавать новую версию. Я вижу несколько путей, которые были удалены, и новые, нанесенные на карту по тому же маршруту.