building appears not to have been built as a mosque, so not building=mosque. if it is part Oldham Central Masjid, could be combined in a relation

1. should this building be tagged =mosque? it looks like it's probably a repurposed former something else
2. Is it part and parcel of the Ross Street Masjid? If so, could be combined in a relation

probably "Al-Hira"

can anyone confirm?

https://mosques.muslimsinbritain.org/show-mosque.php?id=1296&map

this mosque is not tagged amenity=place_of_worship.

that may very well be correct, as it's within a school site.

if anyone local knows it's used for public prayers, it could be tagged as an amenity

this building is tagged as a mosque but not as a place of worship

1) if in use as a mosque, needs tagging amenity=place_of_worship + religion=muslim

2) name would be useful too

3) if not purpose-built as a mosque, should have building=yes (on aerial looks like there's a mihrab, so possibly that tag should stay)

two buildings here are tagged building=mosque

that seems unlikely: tag refers to a purpose-built mosque

if both are in use for muslim prayer, should have amenity=place_of_worship tag

if one is a community centre, should be tagged accordingly

or possibly these are de facto two buildings

or only one, and it's been added in duplicate by accident

any local info welcome

either the mosque or the computer shop appears to be badly placed - unless they're on different floors

this building may be an NGO office and could be tagged accordingly

on this site there is madrasa education. is it all co-located with the mosque, or different buildings with different functions?

#surveyme

is this place really a mosque, a public place of worship?

or is it a private madrasa?

this building is built on the qibla (facing Mecca) which suggests it is a building=mosque as tagged

If so, it should have amenity=place_of_worship tags as well.

If so, it may be worth making a relation between the two buildings, if they function as one (men and women, maybe?)