Changeset When Comment
185803477

Hello Claude Kisnot,

I have confirmed with the Engineering Officer for the Chilliwack Natural Resource District that the road has not been re-built and remains impassable to motorized vehicles. Repair works are still in the planning phase as several locations require Department of Fishers & Oceans authorizations as this is an S2 fish-bearing creek.

I have also spoken with one of the Engineers of Record for another project in the immediate area who also confirmed that the road has not been re-built.

Thank you, eerib

186081913

Reverted. As previously discussed, creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org

186073260

As previously discussed, creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org

186073260

Reverted. As previously discussed, creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org

186066233

Creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org

186033363

Creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org

186066233

Reverted for vandalism. New sockpuppet account of a previously banned vandal related to on-going mountain bike trail related vandalism in this area.

changeset/186071526

186033363

Reverted for vandalism. New sockpuppet account of a previously banned vandal related to on-going mountain bike trail related vandalism in this area.

changeset/186039454

186033287

Reverted for vandalism. New sockpuppet account of a previously banned vandal related to on-going mountain bike trail related vandalism in this area.

changeset/186039454

185803477

Hello Claude Kisnot,

Scuzzy FSR is this location suffered multiple significant washouts that completely destroyed the road.

You can see photographs of the damage at this page.

https://ihikebc.com/trips/2023/trip285ScuzzyFSRHikeBostonBarBC.htm

As far as I am aware, the road has not been rebuilt. I can see no permits issued for the rebuilding. I can see no forest harvest authorizations further along the road. And, the BC Forest Service Road Safety Information Map still has a warning about the road washouts.

Thank you, eerib

185877328

Media release

https://metrovancouver.org/media-room/media-release/997

185618809

Hello PatGT (socketpuppet account of user Shinsplints),

This edit has been reverted.

If you would like to discuss this further you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group (data@openstreetmap.org) and referencing Ticket #2026071110000275

Thank you, eerib

185369911

Hello PatGT (socketpuppet account of user Shinsplints),

If you would like to discuss this further you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group (data@openstreetmap.org) and referencing Ticket #2026071110000275

Thank you, eerib

185487451

See discussions in

changeset/185369911

changeset/185354915

changeset/185294073

185486999

Reverted.

See discussions in

changeset/185369911"

changeset/185354915

changeset/185294073

182604474

Hello Shinsplints,

A new user (Donnglet) has changed the trail name of this trail from "Broken Old Wood" to "Cork Soakers" again in Changeset #185420879. Since this is an unsanctioned trail that historically did not have a prominent trail sign up, it's difficult to determine which name is the most colloquially known. I know you feel strongly about trail names in this region so it would be helpful if you two could come to an agreement on the name through a discussion on the changeset.

changeset/185420879

Thank you, eerib

185371839

Discussion available in

changeset/185369911

and

changeset/185354915

and

changeset/185294073

185369911

Dear PatG (socketpuppet account of user Shinsplints),

The reason this needs to be independently verified is because you have previously attempted to vandalize this trail in particular with a shifting rationale and on your main account you've previously attempted to vandalize other trails in the region using serious methods of deception including AI-generated images.

Please refer to the previous changeset discussions.

changeset/185354915

changeset/185294073

changeset/183803084

changeset/181102527

changeset/180834367

changeset/180561671

changeset/176023407

Again, I am reminding you that I have not requested that your accounts be blocked because I remain hopeful that you can change your approach and become a constructive contributor to the project. I hope you will not disappoint that trust.

Thank you, eerib

185355936

Discussion available in

changeset/185354915

and

changeset/185294073

185354915

Dear PatG (socketpuppet account of user Shinsplints),

I am aware that you strongly disagree with OpenStreetMap's policies. However, repeated attempts to vandalize the map data are unacceptable.

In several changeset comments, you have made statements that were not truthful, including using AI-generated images to present fabricated trail signs for signs you have vandalized in-person. More recently, you also claimed the existence of a new trail in what was an attempt to mislead me into visiting a particular area.

You have also used other platforms to make disparaging remarks about OpenStreetMap, me personally, and the Data Working Group. Public criticism is not inherently a problem, but personal attacks and inflammatory commentary are not constructive and do not help resolve disagreements or improve the project.

To date, I have not requested that your accounts be blocked because I remain hopeful that you can change your approach and become a constructive contributor to the project. I hope you will not disappoint that trust.

Your other account:
@Shinsplints

Previous discussion:
changeset/185294073

Thank you, eerib