Hi Jeb,
I see you started with a rather large object. You've done a great job but I'd like to suggest couple of improvements.
If you replace somebodies work please check if any tags are accurate and could be reused. Previously Robert Whittaker used Building=school to clearly make it a school building, your object is just building=yes.
Where possible try to use "make square (S)" on buildings to make sure right angle corners are 90 degrees.
Finally if you know the site, add as much detail as possible. Paths, roads, fence, hedge, gates, play fields etc. That is valuable information not visible to sofa mappers like me :)

Hi christian138,
Thank you for adding new postcodes but I wonder if you could be a bit more specific as to where they should they apply.
I understand that there are two buildings (east/west) but your post codes are right in the middle. Also landuse is not the best tag for a point on a map.

to sie usmialem z komentarza :)

Are you sure they are streams? Shouldn't this be marked as an area - water?

Hi, are you sure that those are buildings:
way/796898964

Czesc,
node/4475469216 czy to w koncu jest Biedronka czy nie. Usunales kilka znacznikow, kilka zostalo jak (email i nazwa po rusku), nie mozliwe zeby to byla biedronka tylko dla rosjan :)

Hi, could you confirm that the below house is really under the service road?
way/822665527
same for this one:
way/822665525

Is this a service road or a drive going under a part of building? If so why not use this kind of tagging:
way/655683153

zagadzam się co do samej korekty ale ten element dachu nie powinien być chyba osobnym tagiem roof.

Hi,
is there any reason for you deleting the houses from Horsey Hill Fort? Are they gone?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81337006

Edit from aerial images, after visiting this area I do agree that this should be art work rather than historic tag. Will correct once back home.

Hi, I have tried to use the Vespucci editor and it is a bit of a pain. I'll correct this once I'm back home. Need to get the name of this street as well.

You've added so many buildings, why delete them?

Czesc,
No wlasnie z tym mialem problem. Jak popatrzysz na ten budynek to sie okaze ze w OSM brakuje dwoch wewnetrznych dziedzincow. Nie bylem pewnu jak ten temat ugryzc dlatego zostaly z building=yes a nie building:part=yes. Chyba brakuje obiektow inner w ralacji ale nie bardzo wiem jak do tego podejsc.

Agreed, my updates were based on aerial imagery (solely). Corrected as per your suggestions, thank you.

Are you sure that the "Roman Pottery" node brings value if is in the middle in a pond? node/6759056445

Hello Mike,
I hope my corrections are accurate and better represent the footpath. However, some of my edits were merely geometry changes and other tags came from previous changesets.

po za tym, bledy moga byc spowodowane przez edytor: MAPS.ME ios 9.4.7

Troche nie moge sie zgodzic z wycofaniem calego changesetu. Owszem bylo w nim kilka bledow i "dziwne" tagi:
amenity embassy
name Veronian Embassy
ale np.: w Legnicy kilkanascie punktow oznaczalo prawidlowe lokalizacje.
Mozemy cofnac revert, i poprawic tylko bledne tagi?

I would argue that both of those are just circular junctions rather real roundabouts. Would you agree to convert both loops to point with highway:mini_roundabout ?

Bunkry owszem są dwa i lokalizacja tych najbardziej skrajnych wydaje się być poprawna. Rzeźby nie pamiętam a sprawdzić będę mógł dopiero pod koniec Lipca. Jest ktoś bardziej lokalny?