even route 24 is f class=2 which is completely wrong

This road meets all motorway requirements

The massgis data base has an error that shows all state route motorways as trunk roads

This is the second time you added the road

please stop it doesnt exist

It is a separate path, separated by an island

Stop, please surgery in person before editing

Does not exist anymore, please stop adding roads without in person evidence

You used old imagery

You used outdated imagery, please survey before making edits

https://voice.somervillema.gov/5035/widgets/46735/documents/29158

It is under construction, I have now tagged it as such.

osm.org/edit#map=19/42.381927/-71.097857

https://voice.somervillema.gov/springhillsewer

https://ehq-production-us-california.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/8553424deb84852d731e021f4005348b7681e5ca/original/1647868315/1c5b3215c4b3e18d893af864cd2def46_SHSS_Drawings_Volume2.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA4KKNQAKICO37GBEP%2F20241123%2Fus-west-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20241123T073314Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=f8a09cd0e980fcf87e00dd2dd216f7ebc7300b5f4d29aaf59dbde05367b9148e

Oops by mistake

Please stop changing cycle crossings with signals to marked crossings, that’s incorrect

The crossings are duplicates

A bike lane should never be mapped separately unless it's separated by a curb. A standard painted bike lane should be tagged on the road itself. A buffered flex post-protected bike lane should be tagged as a track on the road along with the appropriate tagging indicating the separation. In this case, this bike lane is flex post protected and thus should be tagged as such on the roadway. This is already done.

This road doesn’t exist

These are not protected bike lanes, please do not map bike lanes, they are already tagged

These are not protected bike lanes, please do not map bike lanes, they are already tagged

Not a separated bike lane