Is this some sort of revenge thing or do you genuinely belive that grass pastures are farmland?

fixed the self intersecting building 👍

The OSM wiki says that type=site is not very well supported - 'multipolygons are more intuitive and enjoy widespread software support'

You seem to have broken the relation for the grass multipolygon named Awbridge House Farm ,also why did you change the multipolygon to a site?There is nothing wrong with naming multipolygons as opposed to individual meadow areas.

🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦‍♂️

🤦‍♂️

In the words of bambam, Etgg you are wrong 3 people know you are wrong why do you keep arguing against perfectly good tagging

etgg you are getting spammed haha

et) of farmland then you crack open an etgg

If you are both unintelligent enough to think that grasslands are not a type (read subs

you are both unintelligent enough to think that grasslands are not a type (read subset) of farmland then you crack

As the openstreetmap wikipedia page states(landuse=farmland), meadows can also be agricultural in the sense that they are harvested for grass.It says that any grass-covered areas are better of tagged as landuse=meadow rather than the nonstandard and somewhat conflicting tagging of 'landuse=farmland, crop=grass'.

Ok, perhaps it would be best to remove the 'main' role - I was only trying to add some detail to relations

'Main' means it is the main path of the route

I never claimed that my data source was 'Bing imagery' ,I just forgot to add the source as a survey as I did survey it and the surface is predominantly ground

100 MIL BOIIIIS!!

16 years ago…

Yes so I always tag it as private- why not

Yes, I know that a lot of it is bog.If I find any bogs Ill add them to the map and make them inner relations within the heath multipolygon

I know that, I made it a highway=path for routing purposes and to ensure that all the paths and steps in the station were connected to other roads and paths