Hi, Hillwalker.

I was a little concerned that adding this information to OSM, may not be very popular.

I’ve now had a quick look, and can see that the tag/ key combination is a valid option.

This link gives a quick pictorial view of where tagging had already been used. I found this more helpful than the raw output from the ‘taginfo’ reports.

I think this could be approached in an ad-hoc way, but I wonder whether it would be better to do this in a structured way, perhaps using MapRoulette to create challenges for each DX Entity? My next thought would be, how do we check that these are maintained, or new ones added, for example.

Does anyone else have any thoughts on the best way to implement Hillwalker’s idea?

Many thanks,

• Chris
• chris_debian
• 2E0FRU

If an Android client existed for Panoramax, so I could easily collect imagery when driving/ cycling, I would permanently switch from Mapilio.

Fingers crossed.

Chris

Thanks, that’s brilliant! Will have a look at the link, above.

Cheers,

Chris

Hi, this is a really good idea. Have you thought about making a small task on MapRoulette https://maproulette.org/ , so that others can methodically work on corrections?

Thanks,

Chris

This subject is new to me, but the region seems to be recognised by 46 UN membership states.

Wikipedia was just a quick way to get some background; as suggested above, it may be worth discussing on the forum.

Thanks,

Chris

Hi, SJ.

Good to hear your progress. I agree with your reasoning, and having now been made aware of the ‘esoteric’ tag :-) ; this as you say, would seem most appropriate. I wonder whether any sub-tags have been proposed for regularly stocked items, such as books, Tarot cards/ readings, crystals, etc.

As a side note, I think a lot of people think Glastonbury is a festival, and are not aware of the town and it’s ancient monuments and unique ‘feel’.

Well done,

Chris (NW Wilts)

Hi, Alfred.

I should have added a link. MapRoulette has huge potential. As a contributor, ie, someone who works through the tasks/ challenges, I’d ask anyone creating a task, to make it a manageable size. People working on the tasks, get easily put off by neverending tasks.

For example, if a task was created to correct the use of ‘steps’, have a look at how many results the query produces. If it’s over 150, then maybe reduce the geographical area on which the query is run, so that number reduces. So intead of a task for a whole country, perhaps reduce it to state/ county > city.

I’m working on a UK task at the moment, to correct overlapping buildings. The task has 500 results to check and correct. This is still a little big for my liking, and I think more people would contribute if the tasks were smaller. I was having an email conversation with the task creator (Hi, Marjan @TomTom), and I asked her not to tell me the total number of overlapping buildings in the UK. Little and often is the best approach.

If you are interested in creating a MapRoulette task, I think it’s probably best to clone an existing one, and just tweak it.

I hope you find MapRoulette inspiring; we can make the world map better, one edit at a time.

Cheers,

Chris

Good work, Alfred. Are there sufficient results to merit a MapRoulette task?

Cheers,

Chris

Well done.

Have you tried it with AI assistance?

https://rapideditor.org/

This is a powerful tool, but remember the responsibility is yours, when you edit the map, so don’t just blindly follow the suggestions. For example, a shadow or a group of trees could be wrongly interpreted. Perhaps use it to inform your mapping?

Cheers,

Chris

Well done! Making the world better, one edit at a time. ‘The more the merrier’.

Chris

@kmpoppe Hi, just had a go at a settlement in the UK. Could you consider:

1. Amending the comment that is auto-generated on MapRoulette, so it is more meaningful. At the moment, it looks very automated, and could cause concern from reviewers. I added the additional text “Added buildings to settlement” to my commit.

2. It’s difficult to know when the task is ‘complete enough’, so when saving the edits, I paused when I was deciding to click on the options. The number of houses/ buildings that can be added, could be huge (many hundreds+ ?).

3. Related to the last point, and to avoid change sets that are huge, can tasks be split into smaller chunks, that can be completed? I tend to limit my change sets to 50 ‘commits’. Even using AI to assist in the edits (https://rapideditor.org/) the tasks could be potentially endless, and huge. People contributing, will soon lose interest, if each task seems endless.

This is a really good initiative, and my comments are meant to make this work even better, and are definitely not a criticism.

Many thanks,

Chris.

Hi, K.

This is really good work, and I think the MapRoulette idea is a good one. I’d give the UK a good go, then look at other priorities.

As an aside, the figures for Ukraine may be a false positive, and I believe all map amendments are paused, until the invasion is resolved. This may have changed, but worth checking, before investing any effort.

Well done,

Chris

Thanks, Xvtn; I’ll give this a go.

Chris

Yep, I know that one, from old :-)

Could we have:

historic=animal enclosure,

Then

1. animal enclosure=pinfold
2. animal enclosure=pound

or, similar? This means that the historic dialect variation is retained.

Cheers,

Chris

Hi, Jeff.

I’m not familiar with this device, but have you checked you’ve got the latest firmware?

https://www.locosystech.com/en/product/gps-handheld-data-logger-gt-31.html

Cheers,

Chris

Hi, DK.

This looks really interesting, but not something I can get my head round on a Friday afternoon, at work :-)

I look forward to this tool developing, and potentially being a way to inform my idea, here

I had a quick look at the docs, and it looks like the ‘bootstrap’ page may have a couple of typos, ‘boostrap’ (sic).

Being a long time Linux user, Windoze-free since ‘98, it would be great to see a .deb file being made available, as to many, building from source, may not be difficult, but it’s just another thing to think about. Has consideration been made to releasing the software as a Flatpak?

Great work!

Chris

Hi,

“We care about having the best data. We care about having the map. We care about having the best mapping community.”

I think all of these things are true, but the whole OSM initiative is reliant upon people who regularly, or perhaps only once, improve the accuracy of ‘our’ map.

I’m quick to recognise that my heart is in the right place, and if I make 80 edits/ improvements, I will probably make one or more mistakes. My view is that nobody is perfect, and in that example, me or someone like me will have improved the map, even if all 80 hypothetical edits weren’t perfect.

If I want to see a definitive map, I will use one of the proprietary online sources, or an OS map that hasn’t been updated for years.

If I want maps for routing, including brand new roads, OSM based tools are my ‘go to’.

Our community is very good at intentionally or unintentionally alienating contributors, and the recent ‘robust’ discussion about OSM’s Strategy, was an example of good and bad discussion.

I firmly believe that the community is doing the right thing, and for every ten steps forward, we may take one backwards. A bit like tagging, people can propose a tag, implement improvements to the tag, and then after discussion, realise that the tag isn’t ideal.

To use several clichéd phrases, let’s fail fast and learn and recover; and, let’s not let perfection get in the way of progress. When I edit our map, if I’m unsure, I always try to ‘measure twice, and cut once’. If I’m really not sure about an edit, I will either not proceed, or depending on my degree of certainty, I MAY make an edit, and ask for a ‘second pair of eyes’, to check my work.

Sadly, I think we do occasionally get vandals, but I think these are rare. Most of us are trying to do the right thing, and along with other great open source initiatives, such as Wikipedia and GNU/ Linux, the world is a much richer place for these initiatives. The data or the source code will never be perfect, but that’s why we have bug reporting, mailing lists and a diverse (hopefully increasingly so) community.

Licensing permitting, we can iterate/ evolve with partners like TomTom, and by using the many different OSM data quality tools. We have a lot to be proud of.

Let’s remember that the map will never be finished, and to always treat the community with respect.

Thanks for your diary entry, CJ.

Chris chris_debian

Thanks, AllotmentCyclist; i’ll have a look at the link. Sorry for the delay in replying.

Chris.

Hi, have you thought about using MapRoulette to help with this?

Thanks,

Chris