Is there a reason why the HOV lane on WB I-90 is mapped as a separate way? There is no physical seperation from the rest of the carriageway, and much of it is separated only by a single white line

trimet service change: route 24 no longer routes via Kerby and takes a more direct route to Fremont. This pair of stops on Kerby are closed

https://trimet.org/servicechanges/2026march.htm

the ways mapped as bike paths around here are painted bike lanes and shouldn't be mapped as separate ways

Are the "on demand" traffic signals around the county campus actual traffic signals, or are they button-operated crossing beacons that aren't signals?

bus stops and routings have changed in the hollywood district. 42nd & Weidler has been replaced by 42nd & Halsey

new striping and lane config

can we verify if this is a bike path or a bike-designated side road? signages seem to suggest it is a street rather than a path, and there looks to be a house with vehicular access

copied from fixme:
Can we verify that this is actually a seprate bike path and not just a painted bike lane? If it is a standard bike lane then it shouldn't be mapped as a separate feature

- I looked on streetview and looks like the sidepath is for contraflow bike traffic, and bike traffic in the other direction uses a standard painted bike lane?

Shouldn't light rail level crossings be tagged as railway crossings instead of tram crossings?