OpenStreetMap
carciofo's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 56876647 | Hi, please have a look at north-bound Carrera 76: it seems to have been displaced incorrectly. Also, you seem to have downgraded Av 37/Calle 35 to tertiary, but neglected to downgrade a roundabout and links at the Carrera 79/Calle 35 intersection. Would appreciate it if you could have a look and fix. Thanks in advance! |
|
| 54876689 | Hi again, please have a look at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.45827&lat=6.14131&zoom=14 for the overlapping roads created in this changeset. I would appreciate your help in cleaning this up. Since you're such an active mapper, I would also like to take the opportunity to invite you to get involved in the data quality efforts at OSM. The quality of the data is just as important, if not more, as the quantity, so we need the help of experienced mappers to guarantee that the data is consistent and correct so that it can be useful beyond simple rendering. For more details, please visit osm.wiki/Quality_assurance. Thanks in advance! |
|
| 54373875 | Hi, and welcome to OSM! The Historic Pascagoula Bike Trail added in this changeset came up on data quality tools as overlapping existing roads. In OSM, when bike trails run on the road network, only the higher priority road is used and cycleway attributes are applied to it, instead of having overlapping highway and cycleway ways (see osm.wiki/Bicycle). To keep the cycleway and highway segments of the trail together, a relation can be used (see osm.wiki/Cycle_routes). Happy mapping! |
|
| 56728567 | Hi, you seem to have downgraded quite a few residential roads to service, including dual carriagewayways like NW 23rd Ave, which quite clearly isn't a service road. What was the reason/background for this? |
|
| 56530143 | Hi, and welcome to OSM. Please be careful when panning the map, as sometimes nodes can be accidentally displaced and snapped to other roads, as was the case here with Griffin Road. I've fixed the error. Thanks & happy mapping! |
|
| 52373569 | Hi, please make sure to add layer=-1 when to waterway tunnels or culverts. Also, meaningful changeset comments help other mappers get an idea about what changed, so please help us by adding some meaningful description about what was done in each of your changesets in the future. Thanks in advance. |
|
| 56161945 | Cordial saludo, la nomenclatura tiene prevalencia sobre los nombres alternos, a menos que la señalización en el terreno indique lo contrario (véase osm.wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Cartografiar_lo_que_hay_sobre_el_terreno). Por favor use el valor de la nomenclautura en la etiqueta name y la etiqueta alt_name para los nombres alternos (Amador, Cundinamarca, etc.) No existe consenso absoluto sobre el uso de nombres múltiples, así que por favor no haga cambios con esa base ya que puede ser considerado editar para el renderizador (osm.wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#No_mapear_para_el_renderizado) |
|
| 55084757 | Hi, you seem to have snapped together a river, riverbank, admin boundary and railway in this changeset around Calle 92. Could you have a look and fix? Since you're using iD, you might find it useful to turn off the admin boundaries layer by selecting Map Data (shortcut f) > Map Features and unchecking Boundaries or Railway features (or any others you might find useful in limiting the scope of your edit. Lastly, please use more descriptive changeset comments; "n" is not sufficiently descriptive of what changes you've performed (see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments). Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Happy mapping! |
|
| 55415948 | Thanks for the response and for trying to fix the issues. In the end the issues were too many to fix individually so I had to revert his/her changesets completely. In the process, I also had to resolve conflicts with your edits, so if you could keep an eye in the area for potential geometry errors arising out of the revert & conflict resolution I'd appreciate it --or indeed if the user decides to make another wave of "bad" changesets. Unfortunately the aerials for the area are quite outdated and the last time I drove by that segment of highway it was under construction, so not sure which of the incorrectly merged value for the lanes tag is most up-to-date.
|
|
| 54876689 | Hi, thanks for your contribution. There are, however, quite a few duplicate overlapping roads in this changesets. Kindly remove the duplicates as they're coming up in data quality tools. Thanks in advance. |
|
| 48105285 | Hi, regarding way/489170464, could you check the maxheight attribute you added to it? 15" seems like an impossibly low clearance. Thanks |
|
| 53277109 | Hi Jonathan, this looks like an import judging by the tags in the relations. Could you please let us know what source you used for this along with a link to the license or any discussion to that effect? Thanks in advance. |
|
| 55408318 | Bienvenido a OSM. Algunos de sus cambios, en especial equellos que modifican la prioridad de las vías al igual que sus nombres debieron ser revertidos. Lo invitamos a que visite la wiki para conocer más acerca del significado de cada etiqueta y su uso y convenciones en OSM. La guía para mapear en Colombia contiene un buen resumen de las prioridades de carreteras en OSM aplicadas al caso específico de Colombia al igual que el etiquetado de calles que tienen varios nombres: osm.wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia. Si tiene alguna duda no dude en ponerse en contacto. Cordial saludo. |
|
| 55391150 | Hello!
|
|
| 55415948 | Hi, could you provide a source for the road priority upgrades you performed in this changeset? E.g. from secondary to primary in Av. del Ferrocarril WAY: 30658150 |
|
| 55391336 | Hello!
|
|
| 55392103 | Hello!
|
|
| 55406571 | Hello!
|
|
| 55407779 | Hello!
|
|
| 55408318 | Hello!
|