This one clearly isn't signed as such. I'm not clear on whether OSM would rather show the roads as any orders create or as signed. If the former, then if it can be referenced from an open licence then this edit should stand. But if the latter, it should be reverted.

Looks like this user has been plagerising AA Maps here.

Looks like this changeset adds a massive number of fictional junction numbers to the A1 north of newcastle.

Another fantasy junction number.

More fantasy junction numbers

More fake junction numbers from your fantasy world,Grey?

This changeset contains a lot of changes; however, specifically Harlaxton Road junction does not have a number. This junction doesn't have a number. We've discussed this on SABRE wiki before. Putting junction numbers on OSM because you have a fantasy that they should be numbered, and then using the "OSM" source to reference the change on SABRE is unacceptable, and I'm sure the admins here will have the same view.

This junction doesn't have a number. We've discussed this on SABRE wiki before. Putting junction numbers on OSM because you have a fantasy that they should be numbered, and then using the "OSM" source to reference the change on SABRE is unacceptable, and I'm sure the admins here will have the same view.

This junction doesn't have a number. We've discussed this on SABRE wiki before. Putting junction numbers on OSM because you have a fantasy that they should be numbered, and then using the "OSM" source to reference the change on SABRE is unacceptable, and I'm sure the admins here will have the same view.

the user seems to be contributing random rubbish - i'd suggest reversion.

Nope, Stortford isn't a City either.

Ah yes, the metropolis of Southend. When was it granted City status? Do tell.

Where's the evidence for Brampton Hut being A1 J13a? There weren't any signs last Thursday indicating this change when I drove through.

It looks like in this edit you're adding junction numbers from your fantasy world to the A12. None of the A12 junctions inside the M25 have numbers.

Where are the junction number references? Also, shouldn't they be highway=junction rather than highway=motorway_junction as neither are GSJs

Why have you renumbered this spur as the A41(M) - what's your source for this?

Grey, this was signed as a spur of the A65 last time I was at the junction about six months ago. What makes you think that it's the A590?

Yes and no - the physical properties mapped do exist but it is not operational. I surveyed this with GPS walking the route last year - photos of it are on SABRE. Signs are green as the A52 for the intermediate roundabout. However, road vehicles are currently blocked by concrete blocks. The A1 junction work has not yet started, even as of last week when I last drove past. You can just see the road from the A1 here, the A1 itself travels up a crest at the point where the junction is.

I doubt I added the name in the first instance - I was probably splitting ways, adding lighting/non lighting/carriageway_ref/lanes/bridges/embankments from the existing way.

That said, on approach to the motorway, there used to be signs saying "London Orbital M25 x miles". I'm sure that some fo the literature at the time it was built (after it was known it was going to be a single road) named it "London Orbital Motorway". Also public enquiries at the time referred to the London Orbital: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11292342

I've absolutely no idea - I don't recall adding that (but it is over three years ago!); maybe I split it from somewhere, or copied something with "r" accidentally from somewhere else where it's disappeared from since..... I've no problem with the tag being removed if it is meaningless to everyone.